Re: [lldb-dev] [10.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 4 is here

2020-03-16 Thread Hans Wennborg via lldb-dev
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 8:09 PM Hans Wennborg wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > Release Candidate 4 was tagged earlier today as llvmorg-10.0.0-rc4 on > the release branch at b406eab8880. It contains 12 commits since the > previous release candidate. > > If no new problems arise, this is what the fina

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Switching from Bugzilla to Github Issues

2020-03-16 Thread Tom Stellard via lldb-dev
On 02/10/2020 07:40 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: > On 01/30/2020 12:47 PM, David Major wrote: >> Would it make sense to wait until 10.0.0 is released, in order to keep all >> the blockers in one place? >> > > Yes, I think this makes sense, let's postpone until then. > Hi, 10.0.0-rc4 was just releas

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] RFC: Switching from Bugzilla to Github Issues

2020-03-16 Thread Aaron Ballman via lldb-dev
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 10:44 AM Tom Stellard via cfe-dev wrote: > > On 02/10/2020 07:40 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: > > On 01/30/2020 12:47 PM, David Major wrote: > >> Would it make sense to wait until 10.0.0 is released, in order to keep all > >> the blockers in one place? > >> > > > > Yes, I think

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] RFC: Switching from Bugzilla to Github Issues

2020-03-16 Thread James Henderson via lldb-dev
On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 at 14:44, Tom Stellard via cfe-dev < cfe-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 02/10/2020 07:40 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: > > On 01/30/2020 12:47 PM, David Major wrote: > >> Would it make sense to wait until 10.0.0 is released, in order to keep > all the blockers in one place? > >> > >

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] RFC: Switching from Bugzilla to Github Issues

2020-03-16 Thread Tom Stellard via lldb-dev
On 03/16/2020 08:00 AM, James Henderson wrote: > > > On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 at 14:44, Tom Stellard via cfe-dev > mailto:cfe-...@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > > On 02/10/2020 07:40 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: > > On 01/30/2020 12:47 PM, David Major wrote: > >> Would it make sense to wait until

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] RFC: Switching from Bugzilla to Github Issues

2020-03-16 Thread James Henderson via lldb-dev
On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 at 15:08, Tom Stellard wrote: > On 03/16/2020 08:00 AM, James Henderson wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 at 14:44, Tom Stellard via cfe-dev < > cfe-...@lists.llvm.org > wrote: > > > > On 02/10/2020 07:40 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: > >

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] RFC: Switching from Bugzilla to Github Issues

2020-03-16 Thread James Y Knight via lldb-dev
I think we ought to setup some sort of organized scheme for volunteers to do triage of incoming issues, to make sure they've got enough actionable info, and direct to the correct people as needed. (This would actually be a really nice thing to have, regardless of which bugtracking system we have.)

Re: [lldb-dev] Question about LLDB SBEvent C++ API

2020-03-16 Thread Greg Clayton via lldb-dev
> On Mar 14, 2020, at 4:13 PM, Rui Liu via lldb-dev > wrote: > > Hi LLDB devs, > > The SBEvent API has GetType() method on it, which returns a uint32_t, however > I didn't find any documentation on how to interpret this uint32_t... Is there > a enum for it somewhere? > > There is a GetDesc

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Switching from Bugzilla to Github Issues

2020-03-16 Thread Tom Stellard via lldb-dev
On 03/16/2020 10:13 AM, Florian Hahn wrote: > Hi, > >> On Mar 16, 2020, at 14:43, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev >> mailto:llvm-...@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> >> I've also implemented a notification system using GitHub actions that will >> make >> it possible to subscribe to individual issue tags, so