Re: [lldb-dev] issue with lldb9 and python3.5

2019-10-29 Thread Serge Guelton via lldb-dev
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 10:09:53AM -0700, Adrian McCarthy wrote: > +1 Yes, for Windows, I'd be happy if we said Python 3.6+. I investigated the bug yesterday, and filled some of my discoveries in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43830 TLDR: libpython uses libreadline and lldb uses libed

Re: [lldb-dev] issue with lldb9 and python3.5

2019-10-29 Thread Pavel Labath via lldb-dev
On 29/10/2019 09:31, Serge Guelton via lldb-dev wrote: On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 10:09:53AM -0700, Adrian McCarthy wrote: +1 Yes, for Windows, I'd be happy if we said Python 3.6+. I investigated the bug yesterday, and filled some of my discoveries in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4

Re: [lldb-dev] issue with lldb9 and python3.5

2019-10-29 Thread Kamil Rytarowski via lldb-dev
On 29.10.2019 21:40, Christos Zoulas wrote: > On Oct 29, 6:54pm, pa...@labath.sk (Pavel Labath) wrote: > -- Subject: Re: [lldb-dev] issue with lldb9 and python3.5 > > | On 29/10/2019 09:31, Serge Guelton via lldb-dev wrote: > | > On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 10:09:53AM -0700, Adrian McCarthy wrote: >