I had a short side-conversation at one of the roundtables about existing
users of the subproject repositories. It would be helpful to have
instructions about the best way to move local branches in those
repositories to the monorepo and some scripts to help with the
transition. I know someone post
On 10/22/2018 08:31 AM, David Greene wrote:
> I had a short side-conversation at one of the roundtables about existing
> users of the subproject repositories. It would be helpful to have
> instructions about the best way to move local branches in those
> repositories to the monorepo and some scrip
When I view monorepo, the google stable branch have the problem that always
delete all the contents, and then copy the stable branch.
May us skip those delte branch actions.
Refere to
```
SHA-1: 00353aa9741e8419a0ab140559fd6fdfaaac04af
* Updating branches/google/stable to r309660
llvm-svn=309869
James and Tom,
One question. Would the monorepo be fixed and would it not be re-created
after the day?
I am deeply cosmetic-checking the repo. For now, I haven't found critical
issues, though.
Takumi
On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 9:47 AM Tom Stellard via llvm-dev <
llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> It would be helpful to have instructions about the best way to move
local branches in those repositories to the monorepo and some scripts to
help with the transition.
I put together https://reviews.llvm.org/D53414.
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 8:31 AM David Greene via llvm-dev <
llvm-...@lists.llvm
At this point, Tuesday is definitely not going to happen. I'll recreate the
prototype tomorrow to fix the issue you discovered, and aim for Thursday to
make it final unless more changes are needed.
But yes, the goal is to, very soon, declare the conversion is "final",
publish it at the official ur
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35310
Nelson Elhage changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
