[lldb-dev] [Bug 20689] LLDB fails to compile from command line on OS X (Linux OK)

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20689 lab...@google.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[lldb-dev] [Bug 22730] PythonAPI debugger.SetOutputFileHandle() causes crash

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22730 lab...@google.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lab...@google.com Resolution|---

[lldb-dev] [Bug 17501] There is no way to set argument like -Xxm100m

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17501 lab...@google.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lab...@google.com Status|NEW

[lldb-dev] [Bug 36251] Crash in "intern-state" thread after removing breakpoints and continue

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36251 lab...@google.com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED CC|

[lldb-dev] [Bug 23606] Support for non-x86(_64) architectures in LinuxSignals

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23606 lab...@google.com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|REOPENED

[lldb-dev] [Bug 20274] TestCallStopAndContinue failing intermittently on most/all platforms

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20274 lab...@google.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[lldb-dev] [Bug 23287] lldb crashes when displaying information for an array of structs and inside of struct there is a long double member field

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23287 lab...@google.com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[lldb-dev] [Bug 23478] Continue in case of 2 consecutive breakpoint

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23478 lab...@google.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lab...@google.com Status|NEW

[lldb-dev] [Bug 19950] CMake does not look for swig

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19950 lab...@google.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[lldb-dev] [Bug 27237] Cannot link lldb-server on a i386 system

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27237 lab...@google.com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|NEW

[lldb-dev] [Bug 25632] LLDB does not use the .debug_frame section to read the CFI

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25632 lab...@google.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[lldb-dev] [Bug 18821] lldb prompt incorrect on Ubuntu 12.04 with stock libedit-dev

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18821 lab...@google.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[lldb-dev] [Bug 21918] Error compiling SBDebugger.cpp for lldb trunk

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21918 lab...@google.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[lldb-dev] [Bug 37317] ModuleList::FindGlobalVariables fails with append=false

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37317 Tom Tromey changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[lldb-dev] [Bug 27257] Integer division expression not correctly evaluated

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27257 lab...@google.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[lldb-dev] [Bug 26248] Disassembly incorrect for x64 RIP-relative

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26248 lab...@google.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lab...@google.com Status|NEW

[lldb-dev] [Bug 27326] Provide a way to exit lldb with a non-zero exit status

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27326 lab...@google.com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[lldb-dev] [Bug 25086] lldb should use unix socket for communication with server on linux

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25086 lab...@google.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[lldb-dev] [Bug 20866] link error: undefined symbols for architecture x86_64

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20866 lab...@google.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[lldb-dev] [Bug 24497] Single stepping over an instruction that jumps to invalid memory fails on Android arm

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24497 lab...@google.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[lldb-dev] [Bug 22045] Do not hardcode Python version in Makefile

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22045 lab...@google.com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|NEW

[lldb-dev] [Bug 30887] lldb fails to build because of library interdependencies

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30887 lab...@google.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[lldb-dev] [Bug 30928] check-lldb-unit fails on r286085, TestArm64InstEmulation.TestSimpleDarwinFunction failed

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30928 lab...@google.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[lldb-dev] [Bug 23360] TestProcessAttach occasionally times out on Linux

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23360 lab...@google.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lab...@google.com Status|NEW

[lldb-dev] [Bug 27384] Can't get a modulo (%)

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27384 lab...@google.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[lldb-dev] [Bug 27516] test suite: add a skipUnless-style decorator for skipping unless libc++ is available

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27516 lab...@google.com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[lldb-dev] [Bug 24553] pro hand does not handle all SIGSEGV/SIGBUS signals

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24553 lab...@google.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[lldb-dev] LLDB tests duplicated between lldb-suite and lit

Hey all, I've been looking at some of the test failures on Windows and this led me to realize that there are at least several tests that are duplicated between lldb-suite and the lit tests. This appears to have been on purpose circa 2016 as a proof of concept for moving tests from lldb-suite to

Re: [lldb-dev] LLDB tests duplicated between lldb-suite and lit

Yea, removing them is probably fine. On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:14 AM Stella Stamenova wrote: > Hey all, > > > > I’ve been looking at some of the test failures on Windows and this led me > to realize that there are at least several tests that are duplicated > between lldb-suite and the lit tests