Hoping this will at least reduce the spam starting to show up. Let me or
Eric know if you hit any issues with this (we've not tried it before).
___
lldb-dev mailing list
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
Never mind. The option doesn't work the way desired. I'll follow up with
Eric about other ideas to reduce spam.
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 2:51 PM Chandler Carruth
wrote:
> Hoping this will at least reduce the spam starting to show up. Let me or
> Eric know if you hit any issues with this (we've no
Hello,
I've prepared two sets of core(5) files with the following programs:
- 1lwp_SIGSEGV (signal SIGSEGV emitted for thread)
- 1lwp_busyloop (signal SIGABRT emitted for the whole process)
My compiler is GCC 5.4.0 and host NetBSD/amd64 7.99.70.
The first set is written with a custom startup a
On 13 April 2017 at 07:28, Pavel Labath via lldb-dev
wrote:
> Improving the checksumming speed is definitely a worthwhile contribution,
> but be aware that there is a pretty simple way to avoid computing the crc
> altogether, and that is to make sure your binaries have a build ID. This is
> genera
