Folks,
It's been one week after the initial results were shared and three
days after the last answer, so I think it's time to close down and
publish the final results.
The ODF, XLS and CSV files are at:
http://people.linaro.org/~renato.golin/LLVM%20Move%20to%20GitHub.zip
The overall result is t
Based on your comments I have one more idea for a good heuristic. What if
we detect a dynamic branch (e.g. "br ", "tbb ...", etc...) and store
the register state for that place. Then when we find a block with no unwind
info for the first instruction then we use the one we saved for the dynamic
bran
The next LLVM social in Paris will happen on November 22nd, 2016.
Everyone interested in LLVM, Clang, lldb, Polly, lld, ... is invited to
join.
We are looking for volunteers to present (~20 minutes) at this meetup ---
as well as the next ones. This does not have to be a formal presentation:
this
I like that idea. A bunch of other work just landed on my desk so it might be
a bit before I do it, but I'll see how that patch looks.
> On Nov 9, 2016, at 3:54 AM, Tamas Berghammer wrote:
>
> Based on your comments I have one more idea for a good heuristic. What if we
> detect a dynamic bran
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=30969
Bug ID: 30969
Summary: Merge r283728 into 3.9 branch.
Product: lldb
Version: 3.9
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: ASSIGNED
Severity: normal
Priority: P
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=30970
Bug ID: 30970
Summary: Merge r283729 into 3.9 branch
Product: lldb
Version: 3.9
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=30971
Bug ID: 30971
Summary: Merge r284003 into 3.9 branch
Product: lldb
Version: 3.9
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=30972
Bug ID: 30972
Summary: Merge r284001 into 3.9 branch
Product: lldb
Version: 3.9
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P
