Thanks, Reid and Pavel!
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Pavel Labath wrote:
> I think it sounds like something that would be useful in general. I'd
> even go a step further and say that we can replace the current flakey
> test mechanism with your proposed solution.
Okay, I like that idea.
>
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Reid Kleckner wrote:
> Chromium's test framework uses the same technique. It has the potential to
> really slow things down if you have a lot of failing tests. You might want
> some kind of threshold for giving up, I.e. here's 50 failures, I'll stop
> running the
Gentle reminder, the deadline is approaching.
On 2 November 2015 at 13:32, Renato Golin wrote:
> CALL FOR PAPERS / PARTICIPATION
>
> At FOSDEM 2016, LLVM will for the first time participate with a
> dedicated devroom. Complementing the upcoming Euro LLVM 2015, the
> devroom at FOSDEM provides a g
