https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24733
abhiinnit...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Dear all,
I am new to lldb-dev and I hope that this issue has not already been
reported. I did not find any reference of it.
I started with the example from section "Using the lldb.py module in
python" of
http://lldb.llvm.org/python-reference.html
and decided to have the process continue after ha
Hi,
thanks for your report.
Let me first ask you a question. Which version of lldb are you using?
If it's anything less than 3.7, then I strongly recommend to upgrade,
since linux support was not in a very good state there. If you are
using 3.7 or svn, then the thing you are describing should wo
Thank you for your quick answer.
I am using lldb 3.6.0 (the only one packaged for this Ubuntu).
I will see if a more recent Ubuntu has lldb 3.7, or try to install a recent
version from the sources.
Regards,
Louis
On 8 September 2015 at 14:58, Pavel Labath wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for your report.
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=14600
ema...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Oups, I forgot to include the list in the reply to Pavel.
---
No lldb-3.7 in http://llvm.org/apt/trusty/
lldb-3.8 is provided (I guess it is the svn version) and everything seems
OK.
It might be a good idea to mention on http://lldb.llvm.org/ (probably in
the "platform support" par
Ah, okay. For a while the llvm-dsymutil folks were trying to make the output
of dsymutil & llvm-dsymutil identical so that they could be sure llvm-dsymutil
was doing the right thing, so I'm a little surprised the two differ in this
regard. But if it works with .o files & llvm-dsymutil I think
Zachary, when you say x64 runtime support isn’t there yet, you mean for VS2015
and/or Win 10, right? I’ve been building x64 LLDB on Win 7 with VS 2013 for 2
years now.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux
Foundat
Yes, I just mean the debugger can't debug x64 inferiors very well.
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 10:45 AM Ted Woodward
wrote:
> Zachary, when you say x64 runtime support isn’t there yet, you mean for
> VS2015 and/or Win 10, right? I’ve been building x64 LLDB on Win 7 with VS
> 2013 for 2 years now.
>
>
Yes, Scalar used to support the smaller sizes correctly. Revision 245547
changed Scalar over to use llvm::APInt and llvm::APFloat and it might have
messed up char/short support. Please do fix Scalar so it can support it. I
believe llvm::APInt should be able to correctly support this. I will watc
If llvm-dsymutil is dropping the name, then send me your example and I will
file a bug on them to get this fixed.
Greg Clayton
> On Sep 8, 2015, at 10:06 AM, Jim Ingham via lldb-dev
> wrote:
>
> Ah, okay. For a while the llvm-dsymutil folks were trying to make the output
> of dsymutil & llv
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24750
Bug ID: 24750
Summary: ExprFormattersTestCase::test_with_dwarf encounters
Clang assertion failure on FreeBSD
Product: lldb
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Fr
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24750
ema...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
13 matches
Mail list logo
