On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 2:12 AM, Pavel Labath wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Interesting results. We were discussing the same thing last week. I
> was somewhat skeptical to the ideal as I am afraid of increased
> flakyness -- LLDB has hardcoded timeout values in a lot of places, and
> with increased cpu conten
Hi,
Interesting results. We were discussing the same thing last week. I
was somewhat skeptical to the ideal as I am afraid of increased
flakyness -- LLDB has hardcoded timeout values in a lot of places, and
with increased cpu contention, we might start to see this code failing
because the other si
