em is, then I need to build clang to build
>> > clang
>> > :o)
>> >
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> >
>> > Andy
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > From: Zachary Turner
>>
> > Andy
> >
> >
> >
> > ____
> > From: Zachary Turner
> > Sent: 02 May 2017 13:50
> > To: Pavel Labath; Andy Gibbs
> > Cc: lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
> > Subject: Re: [lldb-dev] Unable to build LLDB 4.0 on Debian L
ng is the compiler, it also passes
> (with the -pedantic). Problem is, then I need to build clang to build clang
> :o)
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Andy
>
>
>
>
> From: Zachary Turner
> Sent: 02 May 2017 13:50
> To: Pavel Labath; Andy Gibb
clang to build clang :o)
Cheers,
Andy
From: Zachary Turner
Sent: 02 May 2017 13:50
To: Pavel Labath; Andy Gibbs
Cc: lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
Subject: Re: [lldb-dev] Unable to build LLDB 4.0 on Debian Linux
This is in cmake detection code though, the options you
This is in cmake detection code though, the options you set for your build
have no bearing there right?
This looks like a bug in cmake to me, perhaps a newer cmake version can fix
it?
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 3:24 AM Pavel Labath via lldb-dev <
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> What's the cmake com
What's the cmake command you are using?
It sounds like you somehow ended up enabling -Werror, which is
confusing the backtrace-detection code (and probably most of the other
cmake compile checks).
One of the workarounds would be to disable -Werror.
pl
On 28 April 2017 at 22:36, Andy Gibbs via l
