Re: [lldb-dev] RFC: Moving debug info parsing out of process

> On Mar 6, 2019, at 9:43 AM, Zachary Turner wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 10:32 AM Zachary Turner > wrote: > On Sat, Mar 2, 2019 at 2:56 PM Adrian Prantl > wrote: >> It becomes testable as an independent component, because you can j

Re: [lldb-dev] RFC: Moving debug info parsing out of process

On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 10:32 AM Zachary Turner wrote: > On Sat, Mar 2, 2019 at 2:56 PM Adrian Prantl wrote: > >> >>- It becomes testable as an independent component, because you can >>just send requests to it and dump the results and see if they make sense. >>Currently there is almos

Re: [lldb-dev] RFC: Moving debug info parsing out of process

On Sat, Mar 2, 2019 at 2:56 PM Adrian Prantl wrote: > > On Feb 25, 2019, at 10:21 AM, Zachary Turner via lldb-dev < > lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi all, > > We've got some internal efforts in progress, and one of those would > benefit from debug info parsing being out of process (indepen

Re: [lldb-dev] RFC: Moving debug info parsing out of process

On Sat, Mar 2, 2019 at 2:56 PM Adrian Prantl via lldb-dev wrote: > > > > On Feb 25, 2019, at 10:21 AM, Zachary Turner via lldb-dev > wrote: > > Hi all, > > We've got some internal efforts in progress, and one of those would benefit > from debug info parsing being out of process (independently o

Re: [lldb-dev] RFC: Moving debug info parsing out of process

> On Feb 25, 2019, at 10:21 AM, Zachary Turner via lldb-dev > wrote: > > Hi all, > > We've got some internal efforts in progress, and one of those would benefit > from debug info parsing being out of process (independently of whether or not > the rest of LLDB is out of process). > > There'

Re: [lldb-dev] RFC: Moving debug info parsing out of process

Hi Guys, https://wiki.eclipse.org/TCF#Where_can_I_Read_Documentation.3F I hope you don't mind me chiming in I've been following this thread. I am a little familiar with the Eclipse Target Communications Framework (TCF).

Re: [lldb-dev] RFC: Moving debug info parsing out of process

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 4:35 PM Frédéric Riss wrote: > > On Feb 27, 2019, at 3:14 PM, Zachary Turner wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 2:52 PM Frédéric Riss wrote: > >> On Feb 27, 2019, at 10:12 AM, Zachary Turner wrote: >> >> >> >> For what it's worth, in an earlier message I mentioned t

Re: [lldb-dev] RFC: Moving debug info parsing out of process

> On Feb 27, 2019, at 3:14 PM, Zachary Turner wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 2:52 PM Frédéric Riss > wrote: >> On Feb 27, 2019, at 10:12 AM, Zachary Turner > > wrote: > > >> For what it's worth, in an earlier message I mentioned th

Re: [lldb-dev] RFC: Moving debug info parsing out of process

ng this, go for it. --paulr From: Zachary Turner [mailto:ztur...@google.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2019 10:13 AM To: Robinson, Paul Cc: fr...@apple.com; lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org Subject: Re: [lldb-dev] RFC: Moving debug info parsing out of process GSYM, as I understand it, is basically just

Re: [lldb-dev] RFC: Moving debug info parsing out of process

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 2:52 PM Frédéric Riss wrote: > On Feb 27, 2019, at 10:12 AM, Zachary Turner wrote: > > > > For what it's worth, in an earlier message I mentioned that I would > probably build the server by using mostly code from LLVM, and making sure > that it supported the union of thin

Re: [lldb-dev] RFC: Moving debug info parsing out of process

> On Feb 27, 2019, at 10:12 AM, Zachary Turner wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 5:39 PM Frédéric Riss > wrote: > >> On Feb 26, 2019, at 4:52 PM, Zachary Turner > > wrote: >> >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 4:49 PM Frédéric Riss >

Re: [lldb-dev] RFC: Moving debug info parsing out of process

Hi Zachary, On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 7:23 PM Zachary Turner via lldb-dev < lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > [...] > Thoughts? Having a standalone symbols interface would open many tooling possibilities, the available interfaces are too dwarfish and too primitive. This necessarily does not require

Re: [lldb-dev] RFC: Moving debug info parsing out of process

re; I don't have anything specific to suggest. > > --paulr > > > > *From:* lldb-dev [mailto:lldb-dev-boun...@lists.llvm.org] *On Behalf Of > *Frédéric > Riss via lldb-dev > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 26, 2019 5:40 PM > *To:* Zachary Turner > *Cc:* LLDB > *Subject:*

Re: [lldb-dev] RFC: Moving debug info parsing out of process

On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 5:39 PM Frédéric Riss wrote: > > On Feb 26, 2019, at 4:52 PM, Zachary Turner wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 4:49 PM Frédéric Riss wrote: > >> >> On Feb 26, 2019, at 4:03 PM, Zachary Turner wrote: >> >> I would probably build the server by using mostly code from

Re: [lldb-dev] RFC: Moving debug info parsing out of process

the table. Just throwing that thought out there; I don't have anything specific to suggest. --paulr From: lldb-dev [mailto:lldb-dev-boun...@lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Frédéric Riss via lldb-dev Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2019 5:40 PM To: Zachary Turner Cc: LLDB Subject: Re: [lldb-dev]

Re: [lldb-dev] RFC: Moving debug info parsing out of process

> On Feb 26, 2019, at 4:52 PM, Zachary Turner wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 4:49 PM Frédéric Riss > wrote: > >> On Feb 26, 2019, at 4:03 PM, Zachary Turner > > wrote: >> >> I would probably build the server by using mostly code fr

Re: [lldb-dev] RFC: Moving debug info parsing out of process

On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 4:49 PM Frédéric Riss wrote: > > On Feb 26, 2019, at 4:03 PM, Zachary Turner wrote: > > I would probably build the server by using mostly code from LLVM. Since > it would contain all of the low level debug info parsing libraries, i would > expect that all knowledge of de

Re: [lldb-dev] RFC: Moving debug info parsing out of process

> On Feb 26, 2019, at 4:03 PM, Zachary Turner wrote: > > I would probably build the server by using mostly code from LLVM. Since it > would contain all of the low level debug info parsing libraries, i would > expect that all knowledge of debug info (at least, in the form that compilers > em

Re: [lldb-dev] RFC: Moving debug info parsing out of process

I would probably build the server by using mostly code from LLVM. Since it would contain all of the low level debug info parsing libraries, i would expect that all knowledge of debug info (at least, in the form that compilers emit it in) could eventually be removed from LLDB entirely. So, for exa

Re: [lldb-dev] RFC: Moving debug info parsing out of process

> On Feb 25, 2019, at 10:21 AM, Zachary Turner via lldb-dev > wrote: > > Hi all, > > We've got some internal efforts in progress, and one of those would benefit > from debug info parsing being out of process (independently of whether or not > the rest of LLDB is out of process). > > There'