b-dev-boun...@lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Jim Ingham
via lldb-dev
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2016 2:01 PM
To: Daniel Noland
Cc: lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
Subject: Re: [lldb-dev] Problem with watchpoints
> On Sep 12, 2016, at 11:53 AM, Daniel Noland wrote:
>
>
>
> On 09/12/2016 1
> On Sep 12, 2016, at 11:53 AM, Daniel Noland wrote:
>
>
>
> On 09/12/2016 11:30 AM, Jim Ingham wrote:
>>
>>> On Sep 9, 2016, at 7:33 PM, Daniel Noland wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes, that was pretty much my assessment when I read through the code.
>>>
>>> My existing patch (which I will post when I g
On 09/12/2016 11:30 AM, Jim Ingham wrote:
>
>> On Sep 9, 2016, at 7:33 PM, Daniel Noland wrote:
>>
>> Yes, that was pretty much my assessment when I read through the code.
>>
>> My existing patch (which I will post when I get home) takes a very
>> conservative approach and only modifies what i
> On Sep 9, 2016, at 7:33 PM, Daniel Noland wrote:
>
> Yes, that was pretty much my assessment when I read through the code.
>
> My existing patch (which I will post when I get home) takes a very
> conservative approach and only modifies what is strictly necessary to make
> the callback featu
Yes, that was pretty much my assessment when I read through the code.
My existing patch (which I will post when I get home) takes a very
conservative approach and only modifies what is strictly necessary to make
the callback feature work.
That said, I found myself copy / paste / slight changing a
The main problem with the watchpoint code is that it doesn't share nearly as
much of the implementation of options and callback handling with the
breakpoints as it should. For instance, there's very little need for
WatchpointOptions and BreakpointOptions to be separate classes, they do pretty
I have also noticed a few problems similar to Ted's and I plan to
address them assuming nobody else is already on it. That said, I am new
around here so please bear with me :)
In fact, I have been hacking on a few watchpoint methods for a while
now. I have implemented some features I personally
> On Sep 8, 2016, at 4:47 PM, Ted Woodward via lldb-dev
> wrote:
>
> I recently discovered a problem with watchpoints talking to the Hexagon
> simulator:
>
> (lldb) w s e 0x1000
> error: Watchpoint creation failed (addr=0x1000, size=4).
> error: Target supports (0) hardware watchpoint slots.
