On 20 April 2017 at 18:59, Scott Funkenhauser
wrote:
> Hey Pavel,
>
> What would be a reasonable solution?
>
> Does having the lldb-server read the shared libraries from disk (instead
> of from the process's memory) sound sensible?
>
>
What you are describing should already be the case -- lldb k
Hey Pavel,
What would be a reasonable solution?
Does having the lldb-server read the shared libraries from disk (instead of
from the process's memory) sound sensible?
Scott
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Pavel Labath wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is a known problem and somewhat embarrassing proble
Hi,
this is a known problem and somewhat embarrassing problem, but
unfortunately we haven't had time to look at that yet. The code that is
doing that was added to support loading of the vdso, which is only present
in the application memory (and it is a full elf file). I don't think
anybody has rea
