I've merged r277997, r277999 and r278001 to 3.9 in r278540.
Cheers,
Hans
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 1:02 AM, Pavel Labath wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I do run a basic set of tests (compile+run test suite) on linux from
> time to time, but unfortunately I don't have time to be more active in
> this. I have jus
Hi,
I do run a basic set of tests (compile+run test suite) on linux from
time to time, but unfortunately I don't have time to be more active in
this. I have just completed the test on the release branch with these
changes cherry-picked and it seems to working fine. But I certainly
agree that the r
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Pavel Labath wrote:
> On 10 August 2016 at 22:34, Dangling Pointer
> wrote:
>> Thanks Pavel! I see the changes made in master branch.
>>
>>
>> By any change can these be back-ported to release38 and 39 branches? Since
>> llvm38 is the one aports is offering.
>>
>
On 10 August 2016 at 22:34, Dangling Pointer
wrote:
> Thanks Pavel! I see the changes made in master branch.
>
>
> By any change can these be back-ported to release38 and 39 branches? Since
> llvm38 is the one aports is offering.
>
I think the 3.8 ship has sailed, but there still may be a chance
: lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
Subject: Re: [lldb-dev] First hand support for musl-libc
Hi,
thanks for the patch. I took the opportunity to clean up the code
there, so I have committed a somewhat modified version, but I believe
you should get the result you were trying to achieve. Let me know how
it works
Hi,
thanks for the patch. I took the opportunity to clean up the code
there, so I have committed a somewhat modified version, but I believe
you should get the result you were trying to achieve. Let me know how
it works.
cheers,
pl
On 2 August 2016 at 13:53, Dangling Pointer via lldb-dev
wrote:
