Actually I'd say "libraries" as a higher-level component is more
> confusing, as a newcomer essentially never has to deal with LLVM libraries
> as a concept.
>
> --paulr
>
>
>
> *From:* lldb-dev [mailto:lldb-dev-boun...@lists.llvm.org] *On Behalf Of
> *Zac
Zachary
Turner via lldb-dev
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2018 2:35 PM
To: Derek Schuff
Cc: llvm-dev; Kristof Beyls; nd; Clang Dev; LLDB Dev
Subject: Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] [Call for Volunteers] Bug triaging
I had considered a libraries/Backends:Other as well that would be separate from
I had considered a libraries/Backends:Other as well that would be separate
from libraries/Other
On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 11:20 AM Derek Schuff wrote:
> I wonder if backends are a special case to the heuristic of "let's not
> make a bug component for code components that are too small". LLVM is
>
Zachary Turner via llvm-dev writes:
> Just so I'm clear, are we going to attempt to clean up and/or merge
> the components? If we are, it makes sense to do that before we start
> putting ourselves as default CC's on the various components since they
> will just change. If not, it would be nice to
