On Mon, 2021-04-19 at 09:59 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> I'm considering running some effort to improve protocol-level
> compatibility between LLDB and GDB. I'd like to hear if there's
> interest in such patches being accepted into LLDB.
>
> My goal would be to make it possible to use LLDB to con
> On Apr 27, 2021, at 4:56 AM, Pavel Labath wrote:
>
> I think that's fine, though possible changing the servers to just ignore the
> length fields, like you did above, might be even better, as then they will
> work fine regardless of which client they are talking to. They still should
> adv
On 25/04/2021 22:26, Jason Molenda wrote:
I was looking at lldb-platform and I noticed I implemented the A packet in it,
and I was worried I might have the same radix error as lldb in there, but this
code I wrote made me laugh:
const char *p = pkt.c_str() + 1; // skip the 'A'
std::
I was looking at lldb-platform and I noticed I implemented the A packet in it,
and I was worried I might have the same radix error as lldb in there, but this
code I wrote made me laugh:
const char *p = pkt.c_str() + 1; // skip the 'A'
std::vector packet_contents = get_fields_from_delim
> On Apr 20, 2021, at 11:39 PM, Pavel Labath via lldb-dev
> wrote:
>
> I am very happy to see this effort and I fully encourage it.
Completely agree. Thanks for Cc:'ing me Pavel, I hadn't seen Michał's thread.
>
> On 20/04/2021 09:13, Michał Górny via lldb-dev wrote:
>> On Mon, 2021-04-1
I am very happy to see this effort and I fully encourage it.
On 20/04/2021 09:13, Michał Górny via lldb-dev wrote:
On Mon, 2021-04-19 at 16:29 -0700, Greg Clayton wrote:
I think the first blocker towards this project are existing
implementation bugs in LLDB. For example, the vFile implementatio
On Mon, 2021-04-19 at 16:29 -0700, Greg Clayton wrote:
> > I think the first blocker towards this project are existing
> > implementation bugs in LLDB. For example, the vFile implementation is
> > documented as using incorrect data encoding and open flags. This is not
> > something that can be triv
> On Apr 19, 2021, at 12:59 AM, Michał Górny via lldb-dev
> wrote:
>
> Hi, everyone.
>
> I'm considering running some effort to improve protocol-level
> compatibility between LLDB and GDB. I'd like to hear if there's
> interest in such patches being accepted into LLDB.
Yes!
>
> My goal wo
