Re: [lldb-dev] swig generation and "six" module

2015-12-09 Thread Zachary Turner via lldb-dev
? > > > > -- > > Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. > > The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a > Linux Foundation Collaborative Project > > > > *From:* Zachary Turner [mailto:ztur...@google.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, Decemb

Re: [lldb-dev] swig generation and "six" module

2015-12-09 Thread Ted Woodward via lldb-dev
PM To: Ted Woodward; LLDB Subject: Re: [lldb-dev] swig generation and "six" module What about requiring that the user has done "pip install six" on their machine? On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 1:40 PM Ted Woodward via lldb-dev mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> &g

Re: [lldb-dev] swig generation and "six" module

2015-12-09 Thread Zachary Turner via lldb-dev
What about requiring that the user has done "pip install six" on their machine? On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 1:40 PM Ted Woodward via lldb-dev < lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > r252764 changes finishSwigPythonLLDB.py to symlink the “six” module in > site-packages. six.py is a symlink to > /tools/lldb

[lldb-dev] swig generation and "six" module

2015-12-09 Thread Ted Woodward via lldb-dev
r252764 changes finishSwigPythonLLDB.py to symlink the "six" module in site-packages. six.py is a symlink to /tools/lldb/third_party/Python/module/six/six.py. This assumes I have access to this build's sources when I run lldb, which I don't - our workstations don't have access to the buildbots' fil