ppe Lavoie <
>>> philippe.lav...@octasic.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> 32-bit.
>>>> ------------------
>>>> *From:* Adrian McCarthy [amcca...@google.com]
>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, June 30, 2016 5:36 PM
>>>> *To:* Phili
-bit.
>>> --
>>> *From:* Adrian McCarthy [amcca...@google.com]
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, June 30, 2016 5:36 PM
>>> *To:* Philippe Lavoie
>>> *Cc:* lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
>>> *Subject:* Re: [lldb-dev] compile failure wit
pe Lavoie
>> *Cc:* lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
>> *Subject:* Re: [lldb-dev] compile failure with VS 2015 Update 3
>>
>> Compiling for 32-bit or 64-bit?
>>
>> This question looks relevant:
>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/21743144/using-stdatomic-with-alig
M
> *To:* Philippe Lavoie
> *Cc:* lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
> *Subject:* Re: [lldb-dev] compile failure with VS 2015 Update 3
>
> Compiling for 32-bit or 64-bit?
>
> This question looks relevant:
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/21743144/using-stdatomic-with-aligned-classes
>
32-bit.
From: Adrian McCarthy [amcca...@google.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2016 5:36 PM
To: Philippe Lavoie
Cc: lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
Subject: Re: [lldb-dev] compile failure with VS 2015 Update 3
Compiling for 32-bit or 64-bit?
This question looks relevant
Compiling for 32-bit or 64-bit?
This question looks relevant:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/21743144/using-stdatomic-with-aligned-classes
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Philippe Lavoie via lldb-dev <
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> has anyone tried to compile LLDB with Visual
Hello,
has anyone tried to compile LLDB with Visual Studio 2015 Update 3 ?
It compiles fine with Update 2, but with Update 3 we get error messages like:
D:\dev\llvm\tools\lldb\include\lldb/Target/Process.h(3194): error C2719:
'default_stop_addr': formal parameter with requested alignment
