I've published a short report for the previous milestone, with goals for
the ongoing one.
"The first patch-bulk upstreamed to LLDB"
http://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/the_first_patch_bulk_upstreamed
The next one will turn to be more exciting as I plan to start with
implementation of accessors f
Hello,
For the reference in this thread, I've posted a blog entry on the NetBSD
Foundation site with a summary of the interfaces we were discussing in
this thread:
http://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/summary_of_the_preliminary_lldb
This report covers the topics discussed in this E-mail thread.
I'v
On 15.12.2016 16:08, Pavel Labath wrote:
> On 15 December 2016 at 14:14, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>> On 15.12.2016 14:14, Pavel Labath wrote:
>
> 2. PTRACE_SETSIGINFO - equivalent currently unsupported, I will need to
> add support for it in ptrace(2).
>>> This value is currently only u
On 15 December 2016 at 14:14, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> On 15.12.2016 14:14, Pavel Labath wrote:
2. PTRACE_SETSIGINFO - equivalent currently unsupported, I will need to
add support for it in ptrace(2).
>> This value is currently only used in logging code, so we can just
>> remove it
On 15.12.2016 14:14, Pavel Labath wrote:
> I am communicating with Kamil about the possibility of sharing code
> between the two plugins. We plan to have a common base class for the
> shared functionality between the OSs. I have asked Kamil to perform
> this experiment, so we can identify which par
I am communicating with Kamil about the possibility of sharing code
between the two plugins. We plan to have a common base class for the
shared functionality between the OSs. I have asked Kamil to perform
this experiment, so we can identify which parts of the code can be
shared in the first place.
I am wondering if it would be better to make a common base class, like
NativeProcessPtrace, where all of the common Ptrace stuff lives and then
subclass and override the functions that are different. There seemed to be a
bunch of "#if defined(NETBSD)" stuff in the second patch. Without extra cod
Hello,
I've prepared two patches to make the Linux Process Plugin buildable on
NetBSD.
The diff will help to transform the Linux process plugin to common code,
shared between Linux and BSDs (FreeBSD, NetBSD).
lldb-git: Enable Linux Process plugin on NetBSD
https://wip.pkgsrc.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.
