On 18 May 2016 at 05:08, Pavel Labath via lldb-dev
wrote:
>
> Sounds reasonable. I'd like to add a clarifying point (2.5): If you
> have added a new test, and this test fails on some other platform AND
> there is no reason to believe that this is due to a problem in the
> test (like the python3 by
HI,
I am glad to see more automated testing of lldb. I think it's very
valuable as a lot of people don't have access to that platform.
On 17 May 2016 at 20:54, Zachary Turner via lldb-dev
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm going to be submitting a change shortly to enable "ninja check-lldb" on
> the upstr
Hi all,
I'm going to be submitting a change shortly to enable "ninja check-lldb" on
the upstream Windows lldb buildbot. For now this is an experiment to see
how well this will go, but I would eventually like this to become
permanent. As with build breakages, the bot needs to stay green, so here'
