I can tell you that in LLDB we already do get CC'ed on the list for every
bug. I will grant you that the volume of bugs in LLDB is much lower than
other lists, but I find it very helpful. It gives visibility to bugs that
would otherwise be seen by nobody.
On the other hand, I'm intentionally uns
If the admins guarantee that there is at least one auto-cc (who promises to pay
attention) for each component, I think that is sufficient.
I don't agree. That is the status quo and it doesn't work.
No, it's not the status quo, because we've only started soliciting auto-cc
subscribers in the past
On Wed, 31 Oct 2018, 10:47 David Greene via cfe-dev Richard Smith via cfe-dev writes:
>
> > In fact, I think it'd be entirely reasonable to subscribe cfe-dev to
> > all clang bugs (fully subscribe -- email on all updates!). I don't see
> > any reason whatsoever why a bug update should get *less*
Richard Smith via cfe-dev writes:
> In fact, I think it'd be entirely reasonable to subscribe cfe-dev to
> all clang bugs (fully subscribe -- email on all updates!). I don't see
> any reason whatsoever why a bug update should get *less* attention
> than non-bug development discussion.
Some of us
