Oh! Indeed, that was probably it. I'll try again.
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019, 5:26 AM Hans Wennborg wrote:
> No, there should be no mismatch now. Maybe you ended up using a
> version of test-release.sh that doen't have the fixes?
>
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 6:47 PM Brian Cain wrote:
> >
> > When I bu
No, there should be no mismatch now. Maybe you ended up using a
version of test-release.sh that doen't have the fixes?
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 6:47 PM Brian Cain wrote:
>
> When I built rv2 for SLES11 linux I saw the same phase 2/3 mismatch. Is that
> expected?
>
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2019, 3:15 AM
Hi Bernhard,
On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 4:30 PM Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
> The only serious issue we've run into so far is that clang crashes when
> trying to build current firefox on x86_64. Will put up a bug report later.
Did you get a chance to file that bug report yet?
Thanks,
Hans
_
When I built rv2 for SLES11 linux I saw the same phase 2/3 mismatch. Is
that expected?
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019, 3:15 AM Hans Wennborg via Release-testers <
release-test...@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> 9.0.0-rc2 was tagged yesterday from the release_90 branch at r368683.
> In the Git
On 14 Aug 2019, at 10:14, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers
wrote:
>
> 9.0.0-rc2 was tagged yesterday from the release_90 branch at r368683.
> In the Git monorepo it's available as the llvmorg-9.0.0-rc2 tag.
For this rc, I only needed one patch, from:
* https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42
Le 14/08/2019 à 10:14, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers a écrit :
Hello everyone,
9.0.0-rc2 was tagged yesterday from the release_90 branch at r368683.
In the Git monorepo it's available as the llvmorg-9.0.0-rc2 tag.
[...]
Release testers: please start your engines, run the script, share yo
