Re: [lldb-dev] [RFC] Removing lldb-mi

we just rely on the lldb-mi executable not existing > to keep from trying to run them? > If we do move them, how do we run them? > > Ted > > From: lldb-dev On Behalf Of Jonas > Devlieghere via lldb-dev > Sent: Friday, July 5, 2019 11:44 AM > To: Raphael “Teemperor” Iseman

Re: [lldb-dev] [RFC] Removing lldb-mi

“Teemperor” Isemann Cc: LLDB Subject: [EXT] Re: [lldb-dev] [RFC] Removing lldb-mi Thank you for doing this, Raphael. I believe this shows that it's possible to keep lldb-mi alive, without today's maintenance burden on the LLDB community, a solution that seems to appease everyones c

Re: [lldb-dev] [RFC] Removing lldb-mi

Thank you for doing this, Raphael. I believe this shows that it's possible to keep lldb-mi alive, without today's maintenance burden on the LLDB community, a solution that seems to appease everyones concerns in this thread. I hope this sparks interest for somebody to step up as a maintainer. I wen

Re: [lldb-dev] [RFC] Removing lldb-mi

: *Thursday, 4 July 2019 at 22:21 *To: *Illya Rudkin *Subject: *Fwd: Re: [lldb-dev] [RFC] Removing lldb-mi Hi I am forwarding you this, because I believe you are the original author of lldb-mi. I think I prefer, if it would stay in the project, but I am not really sure. Ciao    Nat

Re: [lldb-dev] [RFC] Removing lldb-mi

I just went forward with this and made a quick test repo with an out-of-tree lldb-mi that compiles against the system LLDB: https://github.com/Teemperor/lldb-mi This seems to work fine with the exception of the python tests which require LLDB’s python code

Re: [lldb-dev] [RFC] Removing lldb-mi

On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 12:58 AM Zdenek Prikryl via lldb-dev < lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > We're using it with Eclipse and Eclipse based product, so I'd like to keep > as well! :-)... > > Zdenek > I do understand that there's desire from people to keep this around (from an user perspective),

Re: [lldb-dev] [RFC] Removing lldb-mi

Of *Jonas Devlieghere via lldb-dev *Sent:* Monday, July 1, 2019 5:09 PM *To:* LLDB *Subject:* [EXT] [lldb-dev] [RFC] Removing lldb-mi Hi everyone, After long consideration, I want to propose removing lldb-mi from the repository. It is basically unmaintained, doesn't match the LLDB code s

Re: [lldb-dev] [RFC] Removing lldb-mi

I use a plugin in Visual Studio Code https://github.com/WebFreak001/code-debug, that uses lldb-mi. It works fairly well for me. Ciao    Nat! On 02.07.19 00:09, Jonas Devlieghere via lldb-dev wrote: Hi everyone, After long consideration, I want to propose removing lldb-mi from the reposit

Re: [lldb-dev] [RFC] Removing lldb-mi

On 02/07/2019 00:09, Jonas Devlieghere via lldb-dev wrote: Hi everyone, After long consideration, I want to propose removing lldb-mi from the repository. It is basically unmaintained, doesn't match the LLDB code style, and worst of all the tests are unreliable if not already disabled. As far

Re: [lldb-dev] [RFC] Removing lldb-mi

On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 3:21 PM Ted Woodward via lldb-dev < lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > We’re using lldb-mi to debug with Eclipse in the Hexagon SDK. I’d really > like to keep it! 😊 > > > Is there any reason why this can't be a downstream project? Thanks, -- Davide

Re: [lldb-dev] [RFC] Removing lldb-mi

We’re using lldb-mi to debug with Eclipse in the Hexagon SDK. I’d really like to keep it! 😊 Ted From: lldb-dev On Behalf Of Jonas Devlieghere via lldb-dev Sent: Monday, July 1, 2019 5:09 PM To: LLDB Subject: [EXT] [lldb-dev] [RFC] Removing lldb-mi Hi everyone, After long consideration, I

[lldb-dev] [RFC] Removing lldb-mi

Hi everyone, After long consideration, I want to propose removing lldb-mi from the repository. It is basically unmaintained, doesn't match the LLDB code style, and worst of all the tests are unreliable if not already disabled. As far as I can tell it's missing core functionality to be usable from