On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 1:28 PM Louis Dionne wrote:
> I believe the issue is probably not related so much to
> LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS vs LLVM_ENABLE_RUNTIMES, but rather to the fact that
> LLVM_ENABLE_RUNTIMES uses per-target runtime directories now (hasn't always
> been the case), which basically
I believe the issue is probably not related so much to LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS vs
LLVM_ENABLE_RUNTIMES, but rather to the fact that LLVM_ENABLE_RUNTIMES uses
per-target runtime directories now (hasn't always been the case), which
basically means that libc++ ends up in `/lib//libc++.so`
instead of
+Louis Dionne - perhaps the libcxx and lldb folks would
be interesting in finding a suitable way to address this issue, since
currently either option (using libcxx in ENABLE_PROJECTS or using it in
ENABLE_RUNTIMES) is incomplete - if I use ENABLE_RUNTIMES I get the libcxx
testing run against the j
+lldb-dev
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 9:36 AM Luís Ferreira via llvm-dev <
llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Hi llvm-dev,
>
> I'm writing here to discuss the addition of D language plugin to LLDB.
> Following the issue #52223 from Bugzilla, we are currently using C/C++
> language plugin for D. This p
