Re: [lldb-dev] SB API questions

2021-05-29 Thread Raphael Isemann via lldb-dev
I think patches are always welcome and I don't see any problems with the proposed new API (haven't really checked though if they are all unavailable* through the SB API). The only downside to extending the SB API is that we have to maintain it forever. So if we add an API then it should be abstract

[lldb-dev] SB API questions

2021-05-29 Thread Bruce Mitchener via lldb-dev
Hello, I've recently been working on and with my Rust bindings to the public LLDB API after a break of a couple of years. A couple of things that I'm noticing or re-noticing: We need more SB API coverage of logging functionality. We can't list channels, categories via the SB API. We also don't h