Re: [lldb-dev] [RFC] Improving protocol-level compatibility between LLDB and GDB

2021-04-27 Thread Jason Molenda via lldb-dev
> On Apr 27, 2021, at 4:56 AM, Pavel Labath wrote: > > I think that's fine, though possible changing the servers to just ignore the > length fields, like you did above, might be even better, as then they will > work fine regardless of which client they are talking to. They still should > adv

Re: [lldb-dev] [RFC] Improving protocol-level compatibility between LLDB and GDB

2021-04-27 Thread Pavel Labath via lldb-dev
On 25/04/2021 22:26, Jason Molenda wrote: I was looking at lldb-platform and I noticed I implemented the A packet in it, and I was worried I might have the same radix error as lldb in there, but this code I wrote made me laugh: const char *p = pkt.c_str() + 1; // skip the 'A' std::