Re: [lldb-dev] [Openmp-dev] RFC: Release qualification criteria

On 05/25/2020 06:10 AM, Hans Wennborg wrote: > On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 8:59 PM Tom Stellard via Openmp-dev > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I'm splitting this discussion off of my RFC for release process >> changes. >> >> We currently have no official release qualification criteria. In >> other words, we

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] 10.0.1-rc1 release has been tagged

On 05/27/2020 01:04 PM, Machiel van Hooren wrote: > Hi, > > In this release as well as the 10.0.0 release, llvm fails to build on Windows > with the latest Visual Studio version (16.6.0) when building for debug. > See https://llvm.discourse.group/t/llvm-not-building-in-vusual-studio/1139/3 > Ca

Re: [lldb-dev] [Openmp-dev] RFC: Release process changes

That all makes sense to me. The new process sgtm. On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 5:20 AM Tom Stellard wrote: > > On 05/25/2020 05:48 AM, Hans Wennborg wrote: > > On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 8:59 PM Tom Stellard via Openmp-dev > > wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I would like to propose a few changes to the L

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] 10.0.1-rc1 release has been tagged

Hi, Uploaded binaries for ARM & AArch64: e7cdf76722c9f5b90ec3f5d0e6cf5545badc6a7eaf8477b764a25845aee9a844 clang+llvm-10.0.1-rc1-aarch64-linux-gnu.tar.xz a11427f38283a522a22f4799c40518b09b72bdd4170ecb456544b459f74d1fc3 clang+llvm-10.0.1-rc1-armv7a-linux-gnueabihf.tar.xz AArch64 is green (yay! I