https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46032
Bug ID: 46032
Summary: inconsistent behaviors at -O0
Product: lldb
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priori
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46030
Bug ID: 46030
Summary: inconsistent behaviors at -O1 (-O0 is correct)
Product: lldb
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46029
Bug ID: 46029
Summary: inconsistent behaviors at -O3 (-O0 is correct)
Product: lldb
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
On 21 May 2020, at 14:59, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev wrote:
Hi,
I would like to propose a few changes to the LLVM release process.
The
current process is documented here:
https://llvm.org/docs/HowToReleaseLLVM.html
There are two parts to this proposal. The first is a list of
clarification
On 05/21/2020 05:38 PM, Fāng-ruì Sòng wrote:
> On 2020-05-21, Michał Górny via cfe-dev wrote:
>> On Thu, 2020-05-21 at 11:59 -0700, Tom Stellard via Release-testers
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I would like to propose a few changes to the LLVM release process. The
>>> current process is documented he
On 2020-05-21, Michał Górny via cfe-dev wrote:
>On Thu, 2020-05-21 at 11:59 -0700, Tom Stellard via Release-testers
>wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to propose a few changes to the LLVM release process. The
>> current process is documented here:
>> https://llvm.org/docs/HowToReleaseLLVM.html
>>
All of this sounds reasonable to me, but we don't directly follow the
upstream release cadence so I'm an interested observer at most.
Philip
On 5/21/20 11:59 AM, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev wrote:
Hi,
I would like to propose a few changes to the LLVM release process. The
current process is doc
On Tue, 2020-05-19 at 18:22 -0700, Tom Stellard via Release-testers
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have just tagged the 10.0.1-rc1 release. Testers can begin testing and
> uploading
> binaries.
>
> If you still want to get a fix into the 10.0.1 release, you still have about
> a month
> to get your fix in.
On Thu, 2020-05-21 at 11:59 -0700, Tom Stellard via Release-testers
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose a few changes to the LLVM release process. The
> current process is documented here:
> https://llvm.org/docs/HowToReleaseLLVM.html
>
> There are two parts to this proposal. The first i
Hi,
I'm splitting this discussion off of my RFC for release process
changes.
We currently have no official release qualification criteria. In
other words, we don't have any blocking tests that need to pass in
order to make a new release.
We do time-based releases, which is not always compatible
Hi,
I would like to propose a few changes to the LLVM release process. The
current process is documented here: https://llvm.org/docs/HowToReleaseLLVM.html
There are two parts to this proposal. The first is a list of clarifications,
which are things we are currently doing that aren't documented
On 20 May 2020, at 03:22, Tom Stellard via Release-testers
wrote:
>
> I have just tagged the 10.0.1-rc1 release. Testers can begin testing and
> uploading
> binaries.
>
> If you still want to get a fix into the 10.0.1 release, you still have about
> a month
> to get your fix in. To request
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46014
Bug ID: 46014
Summary: inconsistent behaviors for calling function va_arg()
at -O3 (-O0 is correct)
Product: lldb
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
13 matches
Mail list logo
