[lldb-dev] 10.0.1-rc1 release has been tagged

2020-05-19 Thread Tom Stellard via lldb-dev
Hi, I have just tagged the 10.0.1-rc1 release. Testers can begin testing and uploading binaries. If you still want to get a fix into the 10.0.1 release, you still have about a month to get your fix in. To request a patch be backported to the release/10.x branch, file a bug and mark it as a b

[lldb-dev] [Bug 45998] New: volatile lead to inconsistent behaviors between step-by-step and stepi-by-stepi in lldb

2020-05-19 Thread via lldb-dev
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45998 Bug ID: 45998 Summary: volatile lead to inconsistent behaviors between step-by-step and stepi-by-stepi in lldb Product: lldb Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS:

Re: [lldb-dev] [EXT] [llvm-dev] LLVM 10.0.1-rc1 release update

2020-05-19 Thread Tom Stellard via lldb-dev
On 05/19/2020 09:30 AM, Wei Zhao wrote: > Hi Tom, > > We just upstreamed machine instruction model for Marvell's upcoming processor > ThunderX3. This link is https://reviews.llvm.org/D78129/new/ > > Our customers asked us if we can put it on 10.0.1 release as that will meet > their immediate n

Re: [lldb-dev] Pre-merge lldb testing

2020-05-19 Thread Pavel Labath via lldb-dev
I believe pre-merge testing would be very useful. The thing which I would find very useful (let's call it a feature request) is to be able to get some sort of an overview/dashboard of all the runs on this infrastructure and their results. It doesn't have to be super detailed -- the question which