Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [7.0.0 Release] Schedule proposal

2018-06-07 Thread via lldb-dev
> Proposal: > > - 1 August 2018: Branch; RC1 soon after > - 22 August 2018: RC2; all lose ends should be tied up by now > - 5 September; final tag, release a few days later (don't slip past > first half of September) > > What do you think? > > I'm particularly keen to hear from those helping to

[lldb-dev] [7.0.0 Release] Schedule proposal

2018-06-07 Thread Hans Wennborg via lldb-dev
Hello everyone, There's plenty of time before the release process starts, but I'd like to begin the schedule discussion. For the September release we usually branch mid-July. However, this year my vacation runs a little later, so a good branch date for me would be the 1st of August. Proposal: -

Re: [lldb-dev] LLDB Process Attach Failed When Waiting

2018-06-07 Thread Ryan Lovelett via lldb-dev
> sleep_for is definitely better than usleep because of portability (and > we use it elsewhere already). Okay that is what I went with. > Could you attach the patch to phabricator instead > ? It's easier to make > comments and iterate there. When you uplo

Re: [lldb-dev] LLDB Process Attach Failed When Waiting

2018-06-07 Thread Pavel Labath via lldb-dev
sleep_for is definitely better than usleep because of portability (and we use it elsewhere already). Could you attach the patch to phabricator instead ? It's easier to make comments and iterate there. When you upload the patch be sure to include full contex