Jason points out this was gdb writing out a binary form of gdb's psymtabs to be
a cheap accelerator table. Anyway, having the data representation of debug
information depend on the internal state of either the compiler or debugger is
a fragile thing...
Jim
> On Jan 26, 2018, at 6:16 PM, Jim
I second Greg, we don't really want to make the lldb_private namespace into
API. We don't have any intention to stabilize this, and the interfaces expose
a lot of clang & llvm types which are also not stable and change not
infrequently. So in effect your plugin would end up being rev-locked to
> On Jan 26, 2018, at 2:54 PM, Tom Tromey via lldb-dev
> wrote:
>
> Hi. I'm working on adding Rust language support to lldb.
>
> One question that's come up is the best way to handle expression
> parsing.
>
> On the one hand, it would be convenient to reuse an existing parser --
> the one th
Hi. I'm working on adding Rust language support to lldb.
One question that's come up is the best way to handle expression
parsing.
On the one hand, it would be convenient to reuse an existing parser --
the one that we discussed was the "syn" crate. But, this is a Rust
program.
So then there's
> On Jan 26, 2018, at 8:38 AM, Erik Pilkington
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2018-01-25 1:58 PM, Greg Clayton wrote:
>>> On Jan 25, 2018, at 10:25 AM, Erik Pilkington
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> I'm not at all familiar with LLDB, but I've been doing some work on the
>>> demangler in libcxxabi. It's
It's not just reduction of the number of demanglers we have to support,
however.
Greg and I both got excited by this proposal because we've had to maintain
these name choppers for the tasks lldb has to do with mangled names - for
instance matching incomplete human-typed in names - i.e. Class:
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 8:38 AM, Erik Pilkington via lldb-dev
wrote:
>
>
> On 2018-01-25 1:58 PM, Greg Clayton wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jan 25, 2018, at 10:25 AM, Erik Pilkington
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> I'm not at all familiar with LLDB, but I've been doing some work on the
>>> demangler in libcxxabi
On 2018-01-25 1:58 PM, Greg Clayton wrote:
On Jan 25, 2018, at 10:25 AM, Erik Pilkington wrote:
Hi,
I'm not at all familiar with LLDB, but I've been doing some work on the
demangler in libcxxabi. It's still a work in progress and I haven't yet copied
the changes over to ItaniumDemangle, whi
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36109
Bug ID: 36109
Summary: libc++ queue and string tests fail with -gmodules on
android
Product: lldb
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: N
*The Paper Submission Deadline is 9th February, that's only 2 weeks! *
Submit your proposal here: https://hotcrp.llvm.org/eurollvm2018/
Registration is open too: https://www.eventbrite.co
m/e/2018-european-llvm-developers-meeting-bristol-tickets-42283244322
We look forward to reading your submis
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36107
Bug ID: 36107
Summary: TestGModules.test_with_gmodules fails on linux
Product: lldb
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
11 matches
Mail list logo
