Great! Please let us know what works for you and any features you might want
out of LLDB's remote debugging as you use it day to day.
Greg Clayton
> On Nov 29, 2017, at 12:57 AM, Lior Halphon wrote:
>
> Thank you all very much! The script lines (especially "script
> m.SetPlatformFileSpec("/bi
I made a mistake and was not looking at the latest source. Looks like this
exact issue was already discovered and fixed:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D30255
I'm using 4.0.1, so it appears I need to upgrade.
Chris
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 5:45 AM Pavel Labath wrote:
> On 28 November 2017 at 20:54,
On 28 November 2017 at 18:31, Greg Clayton wrote:
>
>> On Nov 28, 2017, at 2:25 AM, Pavel Labath via lldb-dev
>> wrote:
>> The most port-forwarder-friendly solution (and one that I've been
>> wanting to implement for a while, but never got around to it) I can
>> think of is to not require a seco
On 28 November 2017 at 20:54, Christopher Book wrote:
> Hi Pavel, I think you are on the right track in that it already does seem to
> wait for the gdbserver to be up using a pipe.
>
> In StartDebugserverProcess it seems like there is a pipe created to tell
> when the server is running. Here is a
