Re: [lldb-dev] Conditionally adding sources to the build

2016-12-01 Thread Dmitry Mikulin via lldb-dev
Thanks for the suggestions. I’m working on native support for FreeBSD lldb-server, and wanted to have an option to build it both ways until it’s stable enough to replace current implementation. I’ll have it in a separate directory. On Dec 1, 2016, at 2:55 AM, Pavel Labath mailto:lab...@google.

[lldb-dev] [Bug 28055] continue in watchpoint commands disables the watchpoint

2016-12-01 Thread via lldb-dev
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=28055 lab...@google.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

Re: [lldb-dev] Refactoring in LLDB Windows Plugin

2016-12-01 Thread Pavel Labath via lldb-dev
I'm curious, can you share how did you deal with the fact that the gdb-remote protocol is very signal-centric? E.g. every stop-reply ($T) has to have a specific signal associated with it, and some signals have special meaning in lldb. Do you just fake the signal numbers when you need to? Or is the

Re: [lldb-dev] Conditionally adding sources to the build

2016-12-01 Thread Pavel Labath via lldb-dev
The way we have done this with Linux native register contexts was to notionally leave the files in the build, but completely #ifdef out their contents (see NativeRegisterConextLinux_arm.cpp). It's not very nice, but I think it's better than having six subfolders, each with a single cpp file. If you