[lldb-dev] July LLVM bay-area social is this Thursday!

2016-07-05 Thread George Burgess IV via lldb-dev
We'll be at Tied House as usual, starting on Thursday the 7th at 7pm! If you can, help us plan and RSVP here: http://meetu.ps/2XQyLm See everyone there! George ___ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listi

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] Sequential ID Git hook

2016-07-05 Thread Renato Golin via lldb-dev
On 5 Jul 2016 10:45 p.m., "Mehdi Amini" wrote: > > > > On Jul 5, 2016, at 3:44 AM, Renato Golin via llvm-dev < llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > Quick re-cap. > > > > After a few rounds, not only the "external server" proposal got > > obliterated as totally unnecessary, but the idea that we

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] Sequential ID Git hook

2016-07-05 Thread Mehdi Amini via lldb-dev
> On Jul 5, 2016, at 3:44 AM, Renato Golin via llvm-dev > wrote: > > Quick re-cap. > > After a few rounds, not only the "external server" proposal got > obliterated as totally unnecessary, but the idea that we may even need > a hook at all is now challenged. This is not clear to me. How is t

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] Sequential ID Git hook

2016-07-05 Thread Bruce Hoult via lldb-dev
On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 3:18 AM, Tom Honermann via llvm-dev < llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > We're using tags in this manner for our internal repos and LLVM/Clang > mirrors and haven't experienced any problems. We're at ~50k tags for > our most used repo, so not quite at hundreds of thousands y

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-foundation] Sequential ID Git hook

2016-07-05 Thread Renato Golin via lldb-dev
On 5 July 2016 at 12:13, David Chisnall wrote: > Note that GitHub (currently, at least) doesn’t export submodules sensibly > with their svn version. SVN users can continue using the projects directly, they *just* need to change the SVN repository location of every project to GitHub. It can't ge

[lldb-dev] [Bug 28428] lldb.SBProcess.is_running and lldb.SBProcess.is_stopped Python accessors

2016-07-05 Thread via lldb-dev
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=28428 Greg Clayton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

Re: [lldb-dev] Stack variables in lldb with custom generated metadata

2016-07-05 Thread Greg Clayton via lldb-dev
Since your compile unit is Java: > 0x000b: TAG_compile_unit [1] * > AT_producer( "RoboVM 2.2.0-SNAPSHOT" ) > AT_language( DW_LANG_Java ) > AT_name( "Main.java" ) > AT_stmt_list( 0x ) > AT_comp_dir(

Re: [lldb-dev] LLDB-MI from Eclipse hangs

2016-07-05 Thread Greg Clayton via lldb-dev
You should sample lldb-mi to see what it is doing. Also if you can get a more complete packet log of the traffic between Eclipse and lldb-mi we might be able to see what is going on. Another thing to note: if you are remote debugging to a Mac from another machine and don't have any files cached

[lldb-dev] [Bug 28428] New: lldb.SBProcess.is_running and lldb.SBProcess.is_stopped Python accessors

2016-07-05 Thread via lldb-dev
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=28428 Bug ID: 28428 Summary: lldb.SBProcess.is_running and lldb.SBProcess.is_stopped Python accessors Product: lldb Version: 3.8 Hardware: PC OS: Windows NT

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-foundation] Sequential ID Git hook

2016-07-05 Thread David Chisnall via lldb-dev
On 5 Jul 2016, at 11:44, Renato Golin via llvm-foundation wrote: > > Just for reference, GitHub *does* have an SVN interface [1], and you > can already checkout a specific revision with "svn checkout -r NNN > repo", which *is already* using "git rev-list --count". > > This means that, for SVN b

Re: [lldb-dev] Sequential ID Git hook

2016-07-05 Thread Renato Golin via lldb-dev
Quick re-cap. After a few rounds, not only the "external server" proposal got obliterated as totally unnecessary, but the idea that we may even need a hook at all is now challenged. Jared's idea to use "git describe" is in line with previous proposals to use rev-list --count and to do so only up