Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers)

2016-06-16 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger via lldb-dev
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 10:02:52AM -0700, Adrian McCarthy via cfe-dev wrote: > > Most free and open-source software packages, including MediaWiki, treat > > versions as a series of individual numbers, separated by periods, with a > > progression such as 1.7.0, 1.8.0, 1.8.1, 1.9.0, 1.10.0, 1.11.0, 1

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers)

2016-06-16 Thread Robinson, Paul via lldb-dev
| Note that 81 > 8, so those examples would still work. Right, but also 81 > 9 so that example would not work, if you don't understand how the project does version numbers. As different projects work by different rules, I guess the interpretation of version numbers by other tools would have to b

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers)

2016-06-16 Thread Adrian McCarthy via lldb-dev
>Version numbers aren't strings, and they aren't floating point numbers, they are a series of integers separated by dots. I can't think of a project where interpreting version numbers that way won't work. TeX (asymptotically approaches pi), METAFONT (asymptotically approaches e), Opera (decimal nu

[lldb-dev] [Bug 27416] missing global variables

2016-06-16 Thread via lldb-dev
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27416 Marius Trandafir changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|marius.tranda...@live

[lldb-dev] [Bug 28156] TestWithModuleDebugging.py: failing on macOS

2016-06-16 Thread via lldb-dev
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=28156 Todd Fiala changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org |apra...@apple.com --- Comment #1 from Todd Fiala

[lldb-dev] [Bug 28156] New: TestWithModuleDebugging.py: failing on macOS

2016-06-16 Thread via lldb-dev
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=28156 Bug ID: 28156 Summary: TestWithModuleDebugging.py: failing on macOS Product: lldb Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: MacOS X Status: NEW Severity: normal

Re: [lldb-dev] Review of API and remote packets

2016-06-16 Thread Ravitheja Addepally via lldb-dev
Hello All, In the context of IntelĀ® Processor Trace support in LLDB I asked, a while ago, about the syntax of remote packets. Directions were mixed: 1. Taking GDBSERVER/GDB packets (available from 7.10) 2. Going to a brand new packets for lldb/lldbserve

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers)

2016-06-16 Thread Bruce Hoult via lldb-dev
Bug in cmake (or more likely the makefile?), pure and simple. Version numbers aren't strings, and they aren't floating point numbers, they are a series of integers separated by dots. I can't think of a project where interpreting version numbers that way won't work. On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 7:21 AM,

[lldb-dev] Symbolicate user processes when kernel debugging

2016-06-16 Thread John Otter via lldb-dev
I'm using lldb to debug the OS X kernel, and it works great. I would like to have more flexibility in analysing user programs while debugging the kernel itself, and specifically symbolicate the code of the user programs. For example I often use the command showthreaduserstack defined here http://o