Re: [lldb-dev] Incorrect libclang dependency in standalone build

2016-06-10 Thread Eugene Zelenko via lldb-dev
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Pavel Labath wrote: > This is a side-effect of the cmake version bump to 3.4. Cmake now > errors out on non-existing targets. You'll need to figure out a way to > avoid adding this target to the dependency list. Patches welcome. :) Comment in cmake/modules/AddLLDB

Re: [lldb-dev] Incorrect libclang dependency in standalone build

2016-06-10 Thread Pavel Labath via lldb-dev
This is a side-effect of the cmake version bump to 3.4. Cmake now errors out on non-existing targets. You'll need to figure out a way to avoid adding this target to the dependency list. Patches welcome. :) pl On 10 June 2016 at 16:20, Eugene Zelenko via lldb-dev wrote: > Hi! > > I got next messa

[lldb-dev] Incorrect libclang dependency in standalone build

2016-06-10 Thread Eugene Zelenko via lldb-dev
Hi! I got next message for each internal library when building standalone LLDB on RHEL 6: CMake Warning (dev) at cmake/modules/AddLLDB.cmake:90 (add_dependencies): Policy CMP0046 is not set: Error on non-existent dependency in add_dependencies. Run "cmake --help-policy CMP0046" for policy de

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] GitHub anyone?

2016-06-10 Thread Jameson Nash via lldb-dev
For the JuliaLang project, we started with git-submodules for building some of our loosly-coupled external dependencies, but eventually moved to a custom-built solution (we call it "git-externals") to overcome some of the workflow limitations. I haven't yet run across a similar suggestion elsewhere

[lldb-dev] [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers

2016-06-10 Thread Hans Wennborg via lldb-dev
Hello everyone, It's time to start planning for the 3.9 release. Please let me know if you'd like to help providing binaries and testing for your favourite platform. I propose the following schedule: - 18 July: Create the release branch; build and test RC1 soon thereafter. - 1 August: Tag, bui

Re: [lldb-dev] GitHub anyone?

2016-06-10 Thread Tim Northover via lldb-dev
On 2 June 2016 at 08:48, Renato Golin via lldb-dev wrote: > Of all those issues, Windows tooling is a minor problem that shouldn't > impact decision that much and sub-modules need a lot of ironing out to > be considered good enough. My *personal* take away is that sub-modules > (or an alternative

[lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] Switching to git (Windows experience) (was re:[cfe-dev] Github anyone?)

2016-06-10 Thread Alexander Benikowski via lldb-dev
Hi, My 2 cents on the topic: 1) I recommend not to use TortoiseGit. It tries to apply SVN workfliw to git, which doesn' t really work. 2) We use GitExtensions at our company for more than 2 years now. I prefer to use it with P4Merge instead if KDiff. It works much better(in my opinion). And to answ

[lldb-dev] Is lldb-server compatible with GDB ?

2016-06-10 Thread Ravitheja Addepally via lldb-dev
Hello, Can we use GDB with lldb-server ? I see the vice-versa wroks i.e LLDB with gdbserver. I did try using lldb-server with GDB but I got errors (incompatible packet length). I was wondering if there is some special tweaking needed for lldb-server to work with GDB ? BR, A Ravi Theja