[lldb-dev] [Bug 27079] New: Add an MSVC Language Runtime ABI

https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27079 Bug ID: 27079 Summary: Add an MSVC Language Runtime ABI Product: lldb Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: Windows NT Status: NEW Severity: normal Pri

Re: [lldb-dev] SBProcess::Detach kills target

I vaguely remember that not all Unixen support detaching from a process that is a child of the debugger that is attached to it. If you run the process under gdb & detach, does the process survive? This may not be an exact test, since gdb may use procfs rather than ptrace, I don't know any more

Re: [lldb-dev] SBProcess::Detach kills target

Calling SBProcess::Detach() on a process that is currently running should always detach and this seems like a bug. This might be this way because if you launch a process in LLDB and then quit: % lldb /bin/ls (lldb) b malloc (lldb) run (lldb) quit This should kill the process if it was launched

[lldb-dev] SBProcess::Detach kills target

Hi, Is this expected behavior or am I doing something wrong? I am running my C++ program that uses LLDB API on Linux Ubuntu 15.10. If I attach to already running process then SBProcess::Detach() behaves as expected - my debugger quits and the target keeps running. But if the target was launched b

Re: [lldb-dev] SBListener not using a shared_ptr internally?

I am coding bindings for node.js which is basically V8 with an event loop (libuv). So by the nature of nodejs, having "blocking" could stop the whole event-loop, that's why I am trying to make WaitForEvent non-blocking. I am not using swig to do the port. It's more like directly using the V8 api w

Re: [lldb-dev] SBListener not using a shared_ptr internally?

I am currently using the package from Arch Linux's repository, it's 3.7.1. So I guess this "patch" will be in llvm/lldb 3.8.1? 2016-03-25 22:42 GMT+01:00 Jim Ingham : > What version of the lldb sources are you working with? I changed the > SBListener over to using only the ListenerSP internally

Re: [lldb-dev] SBListener not using a shared_ptr internally?

One question is why are you trying to make SBListener::WaitForEvent non-blocking? Seems like an implementation that changes the behavior of the API is going to make the port less useful. Can you go into some detail as to why you are trying to do this? Are you using swig to do the javascript po

Re: [lldb-dev] SBListener not using a shared_ptr internally?

What version of the lldb sources are you working with? I changed the SBListener over to using only the ListenerSP internally in r262863. Jim > On Mar 25, 2016, at 1:03 PM, Paul Peet via lldb-dev > wrote: > > Hey, > > I am currently working on lldb bindings for javascript (v8) but it > seems

[lldb-dev] SBListener not using a shared_ptr internally?

Hey, I am currently working on lldb bindings for javascript (v8) but it seems that the API is giving me some troubles. What I am doing is to basically wrap SB* objects into V8 objects, and since SB objects contain a shared_ptr into an internal class I think I can simply copy construct them. To r

[lldb-dev] [Bug 27075] New: TestLldbGdbServer.software_breakpoint_set_and_remove_work fails on android arm with -mthumb

https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27075 Bug ID: 27075 Summary: TestLldbGdbServer.software_breakpoint_set_and_remove_w ork fails on android arm with -mthumb Product: lldb Version: unspecified Hardware: PC

[lldb-dev] [Bug 27074] New: TestCallUserAnonTypedef.py fails with hard float abi on android arm

https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27074 Bug ID: 27074 Summary: TestCallUserAnonTypedef.py fails with hard float abi on android arm Product: lldb Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: Linux St

[lldb-dev] [Bug 27073] New: TestReturnValue.test_with_python fails with hard float abi on android device

https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27073 Bug ID: 27073 Summary: TestReturnValue.test_with_python fails with hard float abi on android device Product: lldb Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: Linux