Re: [lldb-dev] Spurious process state change events

+lldb-dev On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Vadim Chugunov wrote: > Thanks, that was it! > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Pavel Labath wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> The stopped event should have the "restarted" flag set. You can use >> the GetRestartedFromEvent function to check for that. (Let me kn

[lldb-dev] [Bug 26165] New: Support moving between words in prompt with ctrl+left/right

https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26165 Bug ID: 26165 Summary: Support moving between words in prompt with ctrl+left/right Product: lldb Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: All Status: NEW

[lldb-dev] Spurious process state change events

Hi, I have a Python script that drives LLDB (in async mode), with a listener attached to the process. On OSX, upon the launch, LLDB emits a eStateRunning process state event, and then eventually eStateStopped - when a breakpoint is hit. On Linux, however, the initial eStateRunning is immediately fo

Re: [lldb-dev] Get source-map from python API?

That being said, feel free to add something the SB API and propose a patch. Greg > On Jan 14, 2016, at 3:13 PM, Jim Ingham via lldb-dev > wrote: > > There is currently no API to access the settings. You have to cons up > commands and use SBCommandInterpreter::HandleCommand to execute them. >

[lldb-dev] [EuroLLVM 2016] Registration is now open !

The EuroLLVM 2016 will be held in Barcelona on March 17-18th. Registration is now open and can be done at https://intranet.pacifico-meetings.com/GesCoForm/?cfg=887. Please note there is an early registration rate until Feb 3rd, 2016: 150€ (student: 80€). Afte

Re: [lldb-dev] lldb tests and tear down hooks

There's no reason a finally block inside each test method wouldn't work, and that's probably the simplest solution. On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:59 AM Pavel Labath wrote: > On 14 January 2016 at 21:52, Zachary Turner via lldb-dev > wrote: > > So what if tests could be *either* a method *or* a nes

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [3.8 Release] We have branched

> -Original Message- > From: hwennb...@google.com [mailto:hwennb...@google.com] On Behalf > Of Hans Wennborg > Sent: 15 January 2016 15:52 > To: Daniel Sanders > Cc: llvm-dev; lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org; openmp-...@lists.llvm.org; cfe- > d...@lists.llvm.org > Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] [3.8 Releas

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [3.8 Release] We have branched

Hi Daniel, Thanks for trying out the branch :-) On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 5:30 AM, Daniel Sanders wrote: > Hi Hans, > > I tried the release branch last night and I'm having problems building it. > The problem is that test-suite is now building as part of the Phase[123] > builds (because this pro

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [3.8 Release] We have branched

Hi Hans, I tried the release branch last night and I'm having problems building it. The problem is that test-suite is now building as part of the Phase[123] builds (because this project contains CMakeLists.txt's now) but cmake 3.0.2 (from Debian Jessie) generates an invalid Makefile. The error

Re: [lldb-dev] lldb tests and tear down hooks

On 14 January 2016 at 21:52, Zachary Turner via lldb-dev wrote: > So what if tests could be *either* a method *or* a nested class. If it's a > nested class, it could provide setUp, tearDown, and run methods. These > setup and teardown methods can do whatever they want specific to the > individua