https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25703
Todd Fiala changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org |todd.fi...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving this ma
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25703
Bug ID: 25703
Summary: test runner does not feed timeouts through the test
event system
Product: lldb
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status:
Good news, folks!
Following FOSDEM's own delay on their schedule, we'll extend the
deadline until next Friday, 11th December.
cheers,
--renato
On 2 November 2015 at 13:32, Renato Golin wrote:
> CALL FOR PAPERS / PARTICIPATION
>
> At FOSDEM 2016, LLVM will for the first time participate with a
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Greg Clayton wrote:
> So one other issue with removing debug info from the current binary for
> base classes that are virtual: if the definition for the base class changes
> in libb.so, but liba.so was linked against an older version of class B from
> libb.so, lik
So one other issue with removing debug info from the current binary for base
classes that are virtual: if the definition for the base class changes in
libb.so, but liba.so was linked against an older version of class B from
libb.so, like for example:
class A : public B
{
int m_a;
};
If A w
> On Nov 30, 2015, at 6:04 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Greg Clayton wrote:
>> When we debug "a.out" again, we might have recompiled "liba.so", but not
>> "libb.so" and when we debug again, we don't need to reload the debug info
>> for "libb.so" if it h
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 2:11 AM David Blaikie via lldb-dev <
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Greg Clayton wrote:
>> > When we debug "a.out" again, we might have recompiled "liba.so", but
>> not
