Re: [lldb-dev] TestRaise.py test_restart_bug flakey stats

2015-10-17 Thread Todd Fiala via lldb-dev
Nope, no good either when I limit the flakey to DWO. So perhaps I don't understand how the flakey marking works. I thought it meant: * run the test. * If it passes, it goes as a successful test. Then we're done. * run the test again. * If it passes, then we're done and mark it a successful test.

Re: [lldb-dev] TestRaise.py test_restart_bug flakey stats

2015-10-17 Thread Todd Fiala via lldb-dev
Hmm, the flakey behavior may be specific to dwo. Testing it locally as unconditionally flaky on Linux is failing on dwarf. All the ones I see succeed are dwo. I wouldn't expect a diff there but that seems to be the case. So, the request still stands but I won't be surprised if we find that dwo

[lldb-dev] TestRaise.py test_restart_bug flakey stats

2015-10-17 Thread Todd Fiala via lldb-dev
Hi Tamas, I think you grabbed me stats on failing tests in the past. Can you dig up the failure rate for TestRaise.py's test_restart_bug() variants on Ubuntu 14.04 x86_64? I'd like to mark it as flaky on Linux, since it is passing most of the time over here. But I want to see if that's valid ac