I noticed that when a ThreadPlanStepOverBreakpoint is discarded (as opposed to
being popped from the stack), MischiefManaged() is not called and the disabled
breakpoint is not re-enabled.
Is this the intended behavior ?
-Philippe
___
lldb-dev mailing
If I remember correctly the CMake stuff relating to LLDB_vers.c is kind of
confusing. I can have a look when I'm back in the office on Monday if
nobody else beats me.
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 10:29 AM via lldb-dev
wrote:
> Due to recent changes, rebuilding with cmake and ninja in an existing
> b
Due to recent changes, rebuilding with cmake and ninja in an existing build on
OSX gets the following linker errors (note: it builds fine from scratch):
$ ninja
. . .
Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:
"_liblldb_coreVersionString", referenced from:
lldb_private::Get
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=16684
ema...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24939
Bug ID: 24939
Summary: inferior-crashing tests failing on FreeBSD
Product: lldb
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: FreeBSD
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=18230
ema...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=18200
ema...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Ilia K wrote:
> oops..
> -lldb-...@cs.uiuc.edu
> +lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
>
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Hafiz Abid Qadeer
> wrote:
>
>> Sounds reasonable to me.
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 8:02 AM, Ilia K wrote:
>>
>>> Hi guys!
>>>
>>> I found the follo
