https://github.com/github-actions[bot] labeled
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/6
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/wenzhi-cui created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65583:
None
>From 76107e6a14ca1f496d29bc2f7cb752f39f2665bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: wenzhi-cui
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2023 11:13:45 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Fix AtomicInterfacesTdFiles missing deps/typos in Bazel
https://github.com/wenzhi-cui review_requested
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65583
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/github-actions[bot] labeled
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65583
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/github-actions[bot] labeled
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65583
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -93,4 +93,4 @@
// RUN: not %clang_cc1 -triple riscv64 -tune-cpu not-a-cpu -fsyntax-only %s
2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix TUNE-RISCV64
// TUNE-RISCV64: error: unknown target CPU 'not-a-cpu'
-// TUNE-RISCV64-NEXT: note: valid target CPU values are: generic-rv64,
rocket
https://github.com/github-actions[bot] labeled
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65635
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -258,3 +263,302 @@ then ``lldb B`` to trigger ``lldb-server B`` to go into
that code and hit the
breakpoint. ``lldb-server A`` is only here to let us debug ``lldb-server B``
remotely.
+Debugging The Remote Protocol
+-
+
+LLDB mostly follows the
https://github.com/bulbazord edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65635
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/bulbazord approved this pull request.
All are excellent tips. Thanks for working on this, this is amazing! 😄
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65635
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llv
Author: Alex
Date: 2023-09-07T10:16:55-07:00
New Revision: 140f6167b885b4e0d6672a7f41c2b2b551c0204d
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/140f6167b885b4e0d6672a7f41c2b2b551c0204d
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/140f6167b885b4e0d6672a7f41c2b2b551c0204d.diff
LOG: [ll
https://github.com/bulbazord closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/6
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/jimingham commented:
A good change, Value is a pretty loaded word in lldb, and doesn't seem directly
relevant here.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/6
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://li
https://github.com/github-actions[bot] labeled
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65687
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
Author: David Spickett
Date: 2023-09-08T10:05:16+01:00
New Revision: 3398744a6106c83993611bd3c5e79ec6b94417dc
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3398744a6106c83993611bd3c5e79ec6b94417dc
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3398744a6106c83993611bd3c5e79ec6b94417dc.diff
https://github.com/github-actions[bot] labeled
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65760
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
jimingham wrote:
The test is okay, but this seems like confusing behavior to me. Most people
who use lldb don't set up command aliases and aren't really aware of which
commands are aliases and which are built-in commands. So treating them
differently seems wrong to me. If you have a `br` al
Author: David Spickett
Date: 2023-09-08T17:08:02+01:00
New Revision: 0f1a01807c137736236fcb9ea4253804e5ec7cf8
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0f1a01807c137736236fcb9ea4253804e5ec7cf8
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0f1a01807c137736236fcb9ea4253804e5ec7cf8.diff
jimingham wrote:
Just to make sure there's no confusion... The reason that `b` completes to
`__regex_break` is that we always prefer exact matches in completion. Since we
did:
`command alias b __regex_break
`
then `b` should only complete to the `b` alias. That makes sense, since
executin
https://github.com/jimingham review_requested
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65822
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/jimingham review_requested
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65822
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/jimingham review_requested
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65822
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/jimingham created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65822:
The problem is that the when the "attach" command is initiated, the
ExecutionContext for the command has a process - it's the exited one from the
previour run. But the `attach wait` creates a new process for
https://github.com/jimingham review_requested
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65822
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/github-actions[bot] labeled
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65822
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -2996,10 +2996,22 @@ void
CommandInterpreter::FindCommandsForApropos(llvm::StringRef search_word,
m_alias_dict);
}
-ExecutionContext CommandInterpreter::GetExecutionContext() const {
- return !m_overriden_exe_contexts.empty()
- ? m_o
@@ -127,3 +128,61 @@ def tearDown(self):
# Call super's tearDown().
TestBase.tearDown(self)
+
+def test_run_then_attach_wait_interrupt(self):
+# Test that having run one process doesn't cause us to be unable
+# to interrupt a
@@ -127,3 +128,61 @@ def tearDown(self):
# Call super's tearDown().
TestBase.tearDown(self)
+
+def test_run_then_attach_wait_interrupt(self):
+# Test that having run one process doesn't cause us to be unable
+# to interrupt a
https://github.com/bulbazord commented:
Idea seems good to me. I have similar concerns to Adrian but overall I think
I'm on board with this idea. I'm kind of confused why we don't destroy the old
Process object after it's exited though, wouldn't properly cleaning up after
ourselves solve a lot
https://github.com/bulbazord edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65822
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -2996,10 +2996,22 @@ void
CommandInterpreter::FindCommandsForApropos(llvm::StringRef search_word,
m_alias_dict);
}
-ExecutionContext CommandInterpreter::GetExecutionContext() const {
- return !m_overriden_exe_contexts.empty()
- ? m_o
@@ -127,3 +128,61 @@ def tearDown(self):
# Call super's tearDown().
TestBase.tearDown(self)
+
+def test_run_then_attach_wait_interrupt(self):
+# Test that having run one process doesn't cause us to be unable
+# to interrupt a
@@ -3156,23 +3156,22 @@ Status Process::Halt(bool clear_thread_plans, bool
use_run_lock) {
// case it was already set and some thread plan logic calls halt on its own.
m_clear_thread_plans_on_stop |= clear_thread_plans;
- ListenerSP halt_listener_sp(
- Listener::Mak
@@ -12,10 +12,13 @@ int main(int argc, char const *argv[]) {
// Waiting to be attached by the debugger.
temp = 0;
+if (argc > 1 && argv[1][0] == 'q')
+ return 0;
+
while (temp < 30) {
-std::this_thread::sleep_for(std::chrono::seconds(2)); // Wa
https://github.com/jimingham updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65822:
>From e98672b9f4b02c2baac5ed5dcd94afa9a78e35b6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jim Ingham
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2023 16:18:48 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Fix a bug with cancelling "attach -w" after you have run
a pr
@@ -127,3 +128,61 @@ def tearDown(self):
# Call super's tearDown().
TestBase.tearDown(self)
+
+def test_run_then_attach_wait_interrupt(self):
+# Test that having run one process doesn't cause us to be unable
+# to interrupt a
@@ -12,10 +12,13 @@ int main(int argc, char const *argv[]) {
// Waiting to be attached by the debugger.
temp = 0;
+if (argc > 1 && argv[1][0] == 'q')
+ return 0;
+
while (temp < 30) {
-std::this_thread::sleep_for(std::chrono::seconds(2)); // Wa
@@ -3156,23 +3156,22 @@ Status Process::Halt(bool clear_thread_plans, bool
use_run_lock) {
// case it was already set and some thread plan logic calls halt on its own.
m_clear_thread_plans_on_stop |= clear_thread_plans;
- ListenerSP halt_listener_sp(
- Listener::Mak
jimingham wrote:
>
After a process exits you might still want to ask it what its exit status was.
Plus there might be other system accounting we've gathered for that process.
So until you replace it with another process, you very well might want to ask
questions of it. So we can't just de
@@ -12,10 +12,13 @@ int main(int argc, char const *argv[]) {
// Waiting to be attached by the debugger.
temp = 0;
+if (argc > 1 && argv[1][0] == 'q')
+ return 0;
+
while (temp < 30) {
-std::this_thread::sleep_for(std::chrono::seconds(2)); // Wa
https://github.com/bulbazord resolved
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65822
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
bulbazord wrote:
> This is in reply to Alex's comment about why we keep the process around, but
> the quote this reply didn't seem to work...
>
> After a process exits you might still want to ask it what its exit status
> was. Plus there might be other system accounting we've gathered for that
@@ -3156,23 +3156,22 @@ Status Process::Halt(bool clear_thread_plans, bool
use_run_lock) {
// case it was already set and some thread plan logic calls halt on its own.
m_clear_thread_plans_on_stop |= clear_thread_plans;
- ListenerSP halt_listener_sp(
- Listener::Mak
https://github.com/bulbazord edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65822
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
=?utf-8?q?Björn_Schäpers?= ,Mehdi Amini
,Vitaly Buka ,Vitaly Buka
,Vitaly Buka ,Mehdi Amini
,Shilei Tian ,"Kazushi (Jam) Marukawa"
,Fabian Mora ,Kazushi Marukawa
,Jonas Devlieghere ,Jan Svoboda
,Jan Svoboda ,Alex Brachet
,Jan Svoboda ,Jan Svoboda
,Jan Svoboda ,Jan Svoboda
,Jan Svoboda ,Fan
=?utf-8?q?Björn_Schäpers?= ,Mehdi Amini
,Vitaly Buka ,Vitaly Buka
,Vitaly Buka ,Mehdi Amini
,Shilei Tian ,"Kazushi (Jam) Marukawa"
,Fabian Mora ,Kazushi Marukawa
,Jonas Devlieghere ,Jan Svoboda
,Jan Svoboda ,Alex Brachet
,Jan Svoboda ,Jan Svoboda
,Jan Svoboda ,Jan Svoboda
,Jan Svoboda ,Fan
=?utf-8?q?Björn_Schäpers?= ,Mehdi Amini
,Vitaly Buka ,Vitaly Buka
,Vitaly Buka ,Mehdi Amini
,Shilei Tian ,"Kazushi (Jam) Marukawa"
,Fabian Mora ,Kazushi Marukawa
,Jonas Devlieghere ,Jan Svoboda
,Jan Svoboda ,Alex Brachet
,Jan Svoboda ,Jan Svoboda
,Jan Svoboda ,Jan Svoboda
,Jan Svoboda ,Fan
=?utf-8?q?Björn_Schäpers?= ,Mehdi Amini
,Vitaly Buka ,Vitaly Buka
,Vitaly Buka ,Mehdi Amini
,Shilei Tian ,"Kazushi (Jam) Marukawa"
,Fabian Mora ,Kazushi Marukawa
,Jonas Devlieghere ,Jan Svoboda
,Jan Svoboda ,Alex Brachet
,Jan Svoboda ,Jan Svoboda
,Jan Svoboda ,Jan Svoboda
,Jan Svoboda ,Fan
=?utf-8?q?Björn_Schäpers?= ,Mehdi Amini
,Vitaly Buka ,Vitaly Buka
,Vitaly Buka ,Mehdi Amini
,Shilei Tian ,"Kazushi (Jam) Marukawa"
,Fabian Mora ,Kazushi Marukawa
,Jonas Devlieghere ,Jan Svoboda
,Jan Svoboda ,Alex Brachet
,Jan Svoboda ,Jan Svoboda
,Jan Svoboda ,Jan Svoboda
,Jan Svoboda ,Fan
https://github.com/llvmbot labeled
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65945
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Changes
Some functions in Process were using LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS instead of
LLDB_INVALID_TOKEN.
The only visible effect of this appears to be that "process unload " would
complete to 0 even after the image was unloaded. Since the command is checking
jimingham wrote:
It seems a bit weird to have an Execution context with a thread and a stack
frame but not the process they belong to. I think it's easier to deal with it
when we hand them out.
Jim
> On Sep 9, 2023, at 11:57 AM, Greg Clayton ***@***.***> wrote:
>
>
> @clayborg commented
https://github.com/llvmbot labeled
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65973
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Changes
* Assert no completions for tests that should not find completions.
* Remove regex mode from complete_from_to, which was unused.
This exposed bugs in 2 of the tests, target stop-hook and
process unload. These were fixed in previous commits but
https://github.com/llvmbot labeled
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65974
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Changes
Previously we would check all built-ins first for suggestions,
then check built-ins and aliases. This meant that if you had
an alias brkpt -> breakpoint, "br" would complete to "breakpoint".
Instead of giving you the choice of "brkpt" or "break
Author: David Spickett
Date: 2023-09-11T17:12:09+01:00
New Revision: 3125bd4bc7367a05ddf5477793a1ee51cecc3046
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3125bd4bc7367a05ddf5477793a1ee51cecc3046
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3125bd4bc7367a05ddf5477793a1ee51cecc3046.diff
jimingham wrote:
> > This is in reply to Alex's comment about why we keep the process around,
> > but the quote this reply didn't seem to work...
> > After a process exits you might still want to ask it what its exit status
> > was. Plus there might be other system accounting we've gathered for
https://github.com/llvmbot labeled
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65979
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Changes
By running this from lldb/
$ black --exclude "third_party/|scripts/|utils/" ./
--
Patch is 21.03 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65979.diff
9 Files Affected:
- (modified) lldb/bindi
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ def test_command_abbreviations_and_aliases(self):
self.assertTrue(result.Succeeded())
self.assertEqual("apropos script", result.GetOutput())
-command_interpreter.ResolveCommand("h", result)
+command_interpreter.ResolveCommand("
https://github.com/jimingham commented:
This looks right to me, but I'm worried about why you had to change the "h"
completion test to "he"?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65974
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http
https://github.com/jimingham edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65973
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/jimingham approved this pull request.
Other than that tiny quibble, this looks fine to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65973
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailm
@@ -2254,21 +2251,18 @@ def complete_from_to(self, str_input, patterns,
turn_off_re_match=False):
for idx in range(1, num_matches + 1):
compare_string += match_strings.GetStringAtIndex(idx) +
"\n"
+# If the singular pattern is the
Author: David Spickett
Date: 2023-09-11T18:26:51+01:00
New Revision: 2378ba632e5cdc761584a4154449833ac0f86384
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2378ba632e5cdc761584a4154449833ac0f86384
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2378ba632e5cdc761584a4154449833ac0f86384.diff
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ def test_command_abbreviations_and_aliases(self):
self.assertTrue(result.Succeeded())
self.assertEqual("apropos script", result.GetOutput())
-command_interpreter.ResolveCommand("h", result)
+command_interpreter.ResolveCommand("
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ def test_command_abbreviations_and_aliases(self):
self.assertTrue(result.Succeeded())
self.assertEqual("apropos script", result.GetOutput())
-command_interpreter.ResolveCommand("h", result)
+command_interpreter.ResolveCommand("
https://github.com/jimingham edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65974
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/bulbazord created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66001:
Instead of creating a copy of the vector, we should just pass a reference
along. The only method that calls this Ctor also holds onto a non-mutable
reference to the vector of strings, so this should just make
https://github.com/bulbazord review_requested
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66001
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/bulbazord edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66001
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/llvmbot labeled
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66001
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Changes
Instead of creating a copy of the vector, we should just pass a reference
along. The only method that calls this Ctor also holds onto a non-mutable
reference to the vector of strings so a copy should be unnecessary.
--
Full diff: https://githu
Author: Walter Erquinigo
Date: 2023-09-11T17:00:01-04:00
New Revision: a2a9918a8524f3f7675297b75daa2a80bc0790ff
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a2a9918a8524f3f7675297b75daa2a80bc0790ff
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a2a9918a8524f3f7675297b75daa2a80bc0790ff.di
https://github.com/jimingham approved this pull request.
Makes sense
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66001
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/jimingham resolved
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65822
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/jimingham resolved
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65822
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
Valentin Clement =?utf-8?b?KOODkOODrOODsw=?=,
Valentin Clement =?utf-8?b?KOODkOODrOODsw=?=,MaheshRavishankar
<1663364+maheshravishan...@users.noreply.github.com>,Fangrui Song
,Razvan Lupusoru ,Walter Erquinigo
,"Yaxun (Sam) Liu" ,Nico Weber
,Stella Laurenzo ,Lang Hames
,Matthias Braun ,Arthur
Valentin Clement =?utf-8?b?KOODkOODrOODsw=?=,
Valentin Clement =?utf-8?b?KOODkOODrOODsw=?=,MaheshRavishankar
<1663364+maheshravishan...@users.noreply.github.com>,Fangrui Song
,Razvan Lupusoru ,Walter Erquinigo
,"Yaxun (Sam) Liu" ,Nico Weber
,Stella Laurenzo ,Lang Hames
,Matthias Braun ,Arthur
https://github.com/llvmbot labeled
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66035
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Changes
Summary:
Add a new command
```
target modules dump separate-debug-info [ ...]
```
or
```
image dump separate-debug-info [ ...]
```
(since `image` is an alias for `target modules`).
This lists the separate debug info files and their current sta
jimingham wrote:
I don't think the lldb command line dumps raw JSON anywhere as a command
result. Can we make something a little more human readable?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66035
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llv
jimingham wrote:
BTW, the idea seems useful to me, but particularly if you're doing OSO you can
get a whole lot of these so a space efficient presentation where you can scan
the names easily, etc, will be important as well.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66035
__
Author: David Spickett
Date: 2023-09-12T08:46:34+01:00
New Revision: c8387a31a4adfa9c29a578cf67321f756d3b4ac1
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c8387a31a4adfa9c29a578cf67321f756d3b4ac1
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c8387a31a4adfa9c29a578cf67321f756d3b4ac1.diff
https://github.com/llvmbot labeled
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66053
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Changes
Using:
black --exclude "third_party/" ./lldb/
--
Patch is 108.25 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66053.diff
17 Files Affected:
- (modified) lldb/scripts/analyze-project-deps.py (+42-
jimingham wrote:
Excellent, thanks for chasing that logic down. This is the correct solution,
since we really do want `h` to mean `help` not just accidentally.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65974
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits
jimingham wrote:
I don't see where you approve a PR in this UI but this is approved.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65974
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
jimingham wrote:
> > I don't think the lldb command line dumps raw JSON anywhere as a command
> > result. Can we make something a little more human readable?
>
> It was my idea to make this JSON. The problem is each debug info (.dwo and
> DWARF in .o files for Mac) has very different fields an
@@ -2005,9 +2021,10 @@ class CommandObjectTargetModulesDumpSymtab
result.GetOutputStream().EOL();
result.GetOutputStream().EOL();
}
- if (INTERRUPT_REQUESTED(GetDebugger(),
+ if (INTERRUPT_REQUESTED(GetDebugger(),
---
https://github.com/jwanggit86 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66008:
>From c68ad692f9d4c657f5dfaeb5d8c52c5331ebbb64 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jun Wang
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 15:25:42 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [AMDGPU] Port AMDGPURewriteUndefForPHI to new pass
manager
T
https://github.com/llvmbot labeled
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66144
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Changes
This exposes the `eBroadcastBitSymbolChange` bit to the SB API to show when a
symbol change event has been broadcast as this wasn't being done before. Also
refactors `eBroadcastSymbolChange` to `eBroadcastBitSymbolChange` to matc
https://github.com/ZijunZhaoCCK updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65148:
>From 02e9afd761228f401df4d9f8dfaaca44ffae0c6e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: zijunzhao
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 20:08:32 +
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] [libc++] Implement ranges::contains
Differential Revisio
@@ -0,0 +1,190 @@
+//===--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
Author: Alex
Date: 2023-09-12T15:32:06-07:00
New Revision: 64122580c0809fc6fc15bd955fea4e9ace80a135
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/64122580c0809fc6fc15bd955fea4e9ace80a135
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/64122580c0809fc6fc15bd955fea4e9ace80a135.diff
LOG: [ll
https://github.com/bulbazord closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66001
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/pizzud updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66139:
>From b699129b21c95571410a809d16fdf8cfcf1526c5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Pizzuto
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 13:24:48 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang-tidy] Add performance-move-smart-pointer-contents
che
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+//===--- MoveSmartPointerContentsCheck.cpp - clang-tidy
---===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
3001 - 3100 of 102047 matches
Mail list logo
