JOE1994 wrote:
A new user already asked to be assigned to work on #91209 2 days ago in the
comments.
**I think that user deserves an opportunity to work on the issue**.
Next time when you see a **"good first issue"** which a new user had already
asked to get assigned to,
please assign it to th
https://github.com/JOE1994 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91880
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
JOE1994 wrote:
> We usually don't grant exclusive rights to work on an issue in the project,
> since individual priorities may always change and people might loose interest
> in an issue. Typically this kind of conflict doesn't happen very often
> either.
I understand that, but just for "goo
https://github.com/JOE1994 reopened
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91880
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/JOE1994 requested changes to this pull request.
* The PR contains irrelevant changes to `X86` codegen.
* Author of the commit shows up as another contributor.
It seems like the author of this PR did a `git commit --amend`
on top of e586556e375fc5c4f7e76b5c299cb981f2016108 to a
https://github.com/JOE1994 approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94112
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/JOE1994 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108745
* Don't call raw_string_ostream::flush(), which is essentially a no-op.
* Avoid unneeded calls to raw_string_ostream::str(), to avoid excess
indirection.
>From 35f463d394ec57a38a4e940a61af5cd1f527a00d Mon Sep 1
https://github.com/JOE1994 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108745
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/JOE1994 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108745
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/JOE1994 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108745
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/JOE1994 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108745
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/JOE1994 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110128
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/JOE1994 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110128
Don't call raw_string_ostream::flush(), which is essentially a no-op. As
specified in the docs, raw_string_ostream is always unbuffered. (
65b13610a5226b84889b923bae884ba395ad084d for further reference )
>From
JOE1994 wrote:
> ⚠️ C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. ⚠️
>
> You can test this locally with the following command:
> View the diff from clang-format here.
clang-format is complaining about an adjacent line that is untouched by this
revision.
To simplify patch diff,
14 matches
Mail list logo
