Re: [Lldb-commits] [lldb] r249379 - Bug 25050: X87 FPU Special Purpose Registers

I had submitted a patch for the Bug 24457 which is similar kind of bug but on Linux x86_64 Platform. There, I had submitted a new test to reproduce this issue. The test is already there in public repository. Since, the same test goes for FreeBSD also therefore I didn’t need to write a new one.

Re: [Lldb-commits] [lldb] r249379 - Bug 25050: X87 FPU Special Purpose Registers

Sure. Thanks a lot for suggesting this. Thanks & Regards Abhishek Aggarwal From: Zachary Turner [mailto:ztur...@google.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2015 6:01 PM To: Aggarwal, Abhishek A; lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org Subject: Re: [Lldb-commits] [lldb] r249379 - Bug 25050: X87 FPU Special Purpose

Re: [Lldb-commits] [lldb] r253026 - Fix to solve Bug 23139 & Bug 23560

Hi Pavel Thanks for pointing out. Both of these tests are passing at my end. I am using Ubuntu Desktop (14.04 x86_64) machine and the same compiler version as used by build-bot. However, I will have to take a deeper look into the logs you attached to figure out the reason of this discrepancy.

Re: [Lldb-commits] [lldb] r254499 - PTRACE ABI to read FXSAVE area for 32-bit inferior

Hi Tamas Yes, it was a bug in clang that I had submitted some months ago (ID: 23491) and it was fixed. But the fix is not present in clang 3.5/3.6. Hence, the failure is occurring. Thanks & Regards Abhishek Aggarwal From: Tamas Berghammer [mailto:tbergham...@google.com] Sent: Wednesday, Decemb

Re: [Lldb-commits] [lldb] r246955 - Bug 24457 - X87 FPU Special Purpose Registers

Hi Thanks a lot for pointing out. There was a problem with the compilation of the inferior with clang and hence, the absence of the inferior's executable was causing the failure of the test for clang compiler. I fixed it and will soon upstream the change. Thanks & Regards Abhishek Aggarwal