https://github.com/DavidSpickett edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124059
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/DavidSpickett commented:
ABI details are someone else's job but on generic things this is the right idea.
It needs tests, I suggest you find the tests that read general registers and
add aliased name reads to those. Though it's unlikely to break for just one use
case, I woul
@@ -644,32 +644,22 @@ void ABISysV_loongarch::AugmentRegisterInfo(
std::vector ®s) {
lldb_private::RegInfoBasedABI::AugmentRegisterInfo(regs);
+ static const std::unordered_map reg_aliases = {
DavidSpickett wrote:
There is `llvm/include/llvm/ADT/String
https://github.com/Michael137 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124096
LLDB deduces the CV-qualifiers and storage class of a C++ method from the
object parameter. Currently it assumes that parameter is implicit (and is a
pointer type with the name "this"). This isn't true anymo
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Michael Buch (Michael137)
Changes
LLDB deduces the CV-qualifiers and storage class of a C++ method from the
object parameter. Currently it assumes that parameter is implicit (and is a
pointer type with the name "this"). This isn't true any
https://github.com/DavidSpickett updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123945
>From ecb1b90e109df650ef1b50cc3d07b56fd302e274 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Spickett
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 10:52:16 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Reland "[lldb] Implement basic support for
reverse-c
https://github.com/DavidSpickett edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123945
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
DavidSpickett wrote:
> can you add @skipIfRemote to the tests?
Done
> Another, simpler way to fix the memory read problem might be to just tolerate
> failed memory writes --- log and continue.
Log and continue is liable to be "triager forgets to look at logs, wastes days,
disables the test a
https://github.com/Michael137 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124100
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#124096
Broke linux CI:
```
Note: This is test shard 7 of 42.
[==] Running 1 test from 1 test suite.
[--] Global test environment set-up.
[--] 1 test from DWAR
Author: Michael Buch
Date: 2025-01-23T11:20:14Z
New Revision: a8020930a8174d84da04fa91b6fef244207f42f5
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a8020930a8174d84da04fa91b6fef244207f42f5
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a8020930a8174d84da04fa91b6fef244207f42f5.diff
LOG:
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `lldb-x86_64-debian`
running on `lldb-x86_64-debian` while building `lldb` at step 6 "test".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/162/builds/14712
Here is the relevant piece of the build log
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Michael Buch (Michael137)
Changes
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#124096
Broke linux CI:
```
Note: This is test shard 7 of 42.
[==] Running 1 test from 1 test suite.
[--] Global test environment set-up.
[--] 1 test from DW
https://github.com/Michael137 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124100
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
Michael137 wrote:
Reverting for now to get CI green again
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123393
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/Michael137 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124101
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#123393
This is causing `TestVectorOfVectorsFromStdModule.py` to fail on the the macOS
clang-15 matrix bot.
>From bb21661782242f931f3d04eb8fed9be792bd4ef8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
F
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Michael Buch (Michael137)
Changes
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#123393
This is causing `TestVectorOfVectorsFromStdModule.py` to fail on the the macOS
clang-15 matrix bot.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124101.diff
Author: Michael Buch
Date: 2025-01-23T11:29:06Z
New Revision: 4bcdb26dac4cdadd7f8850a5f9b2e775b73aaf7f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4bcdb26dac4cdadd7f8850a5f9b2e775b73aaf7f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4bcdb26dac4cdadd7f8850a5f9b2e775b73aaf7f.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/Michael137 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124101
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -644,32 +644,22 @@ void ABISysV_loongarch::AugmentRegisterInfo(
std::vector ®s) {
lldb_private::RegInfoBasedABI::AugmentRegisterInfo(regs);
+ static const std::unordered_map reg_aliases = {
+ {"r0", "zero"}, {"r1", "ra"}, {"r2", "tp"}, {"r3", "sp"},
+ {"r
labath wrote:
> > The reason this code looks the way it does is that we've had crashes when
> > trying to read corrupted elf files from memory, where we load the size of
> > the elf file from the process memory, find that out that it's size is
> > 935872395 GB, try to allocate a host buffer of
https://github.com/labath approved this pull request.
I like the unit test, but why don't we (also) have an end-to-end for the
explicit object parameter feature? Is there something still missing for the
full support?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124096
DavidSpickett wrote:
So this is ready for anyone who is able to test on Mac x86_64.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123945
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
Michael137 wrote:
> I like the unit test, but why don't we (also) have an end-to-end for the
> explicit object parameter feature? Is there something still missing for the
> full support?
Yea there's still a couple of issues with it. Particularly, expression
evaluation in such methods currentl
Author: Michael Buch
Date: 2025-01-23T11:16:02Z
New Revision: ad6d808906075c3386bbeada3c37d8d3e6afe248
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ad6d808906075c3386bbeada3c37d8d3e6afe248
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ad6d808906075c3386bbeada3c37d8d3e6afe248.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/Michael137 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124096
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
Author: Michael Buch
Date: 2025-01-23T12:00:45Z
New Revision: 636bc72f672712cb848729c0f130d8b42c86f1cb
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/636bc72f672712cb848729c0f130d8b42c86f1cb
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/636bc72f672712cb848729c0f130d8b42c86f1cb.diff
LOG:
Author: Pavel Labath
Date: 2025-01-23T13:03:29+01:00
New Revision: 3ea2b546a8d17014d3ecf05356ecfaadf26ed846
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3ea2b546a8d17014d3ecf05356ecfaadf26ed846
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3ea2b546a8d17014d3ecf05356ecfaadf26ed846.diff
Author: Pavel Labath
Date: 2025-01-23T13:04:36+01:00
New Revision: 0236cb689550ed2dac406443c652efb723cb2602
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0236cb689550ed2dac406443c652efb723cb2602
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0236cb689550ed2dac406443c652efb723cb2602.diff
https://github.com/labath closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123217
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/labath closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123905
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
labath wrote:
ping
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122440
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `lldb-remote-linux-ubuntu`
running on `as-builder-9` while building `lldb` at step 15
"test-check-lldb-unit".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/195/builds/3894
Here is the relevant piece
@@ -370,6 +370,31 @@ bool SymbolContext::GetAddressRange(uint32_t scope,
uint32_t range_idx,
return false;
}
+Address SymbolContext::GetAddress(uint32_t scope,
+ bool use_inline_block_range) const {
+ if ((scope & eSymbolContextLineEntry) &
@@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
+//===-- DILLexer.h --*- C++
-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
@@ -0,0 +1,205 @@
+//===-- DILLexer.cpp
--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
@@ -0,0 +1,205 @@
+//===-- DILLexer.cpp
--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
@@ -222,14 +223,15 @@ void FormatManager::GetPossibleMatches(
if (compiler_type.IsPointerType()) {
CompilerType non_ptr_type = compiler_type.GetPointeeType();
-GetPossibleMatches(valobj, non_ptr_type, use_dynamic, entries,
- current_flags.WithSt
https://github.com/labath commented:
This makes sense to me, but I'd like to hear what @jimingham thinks about this.
> The current behaviour might cause crash on pretty printers. If the pretty
> printer calls SBValue::GetChildMemberWithName when compute the synthetic
> children or summary stri
https://github.com/labath edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124048
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
labath wrote:
I'm fine (and very happy) with this if @enh-google (or whoever he nominates) is.
I guess this means the whole "single step workaround"
(lldb/source/Plugins/Process/Linux/SingleStepCheck.h) could go away as well
(maybe make a separate patch for that).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm
@@ -25,13 +25,10 @@
#include
#ifdef __ANDROID__
brad0 wrote:
The ptrace header issue and the bits from ar.h header I'll submit. SUN_LEN was
only added 6 years ago so I figure keep it for a little bit longer.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124047
https://github.com/brad0 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124176
>From 6753c51940bd947d1aac1b333f954daa80346a1c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Brad Smith
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 13:19:06 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [lldb] Remove more workarounds for Android that have been
fixed upst
https://github.com/brad0 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124176
Issues that were fixed 10+ years ago with Bionic libc.
>From 4e10a6b316a1562d96808db3d4447539b51e3179 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Brad Smith
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 13:19:06 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [lldb] Remove
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Brad Smith (brad0)
Changes
Issues that were fixed 10+ years ago with Bionic libc.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124176.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) lldb/source/Host/posix/ProcessLauncherPosixFork.cpp (-4
ZequanWu wrote:
> How does this patch fit with the:
>
> ```
>-p ( --skip-pointers )
> Don't use this format for pointers-to-type objects.
>
>-r ( --skip-references )
> Don't use this format for references-to-type objects.
> ```
>
> settings in `type add`? It seems like
Author: Jonas Devlieghere
Date: 2025-01-23T10:37:11-08:00
New Revision: 4cf1fe240589d3f2a8a8332abf3f71a18bdba027
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4cf1fe240589d3f2a8a8332abf3f71a18bdba027
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4cf1fe240589d3f2a8a8332abf3f71a18bdba027.d
https://github.com/JDevlieghere closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120163
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -25,13 +25,10 @@
#include
#ifdef __ANDROID__
enh-google wrote:
> The ptrace header issue and the bits from ar.h header I'll submit. SUN_LEN
> was only added 6 years ago so I figure keep it for a little bit longer.
but it's just a macro in a header, so a
jimingham wrote:
> > How does this patch fit with the:
> > ```
> >-p ( --skip-pointers )
> > Don't use this format for pointers-to-type objects.
> >
> >-r ( --skip-references )
> > Don't use this format for references-to-type objects.
> > ```
> >
> >
> >
> >
jimingham wrote:
If anything, we should allow `--skip-pointers 1` for formatter writers that
only want to handle one level of pointer to the type.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124048
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.o
@@ -25,13 +25,10 @@
#include
#ifdef __ANDROID__
brad0 wrote:
> > The ptrace header issue and the bits from ar.h header I'll submit. SUN_LEN
> > was only added 6 years ago so I figure keep it for a little bit longer.
>
> but it's just a macro in a header, s
https://github.com/brad0 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124176
>From 7c53e345b9264c9bd0ae16cddfb3c8066d43 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Brad Smith
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 13:19:06 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [lldb] Remove more workarounds for Android that have been
fixed upst
@@ -25,13 +25,10 @@
#include
#ifdef __ANDROID__
brad0 wrote:
```
std::optional PosixUserIDResolver::DoGetGroupName(id_t gid) {
#ifndef __ANDROID__
char group_buffer[PATH_MAX];
size_t group_buffer_size = sizeof(group_buffer);
struct group group_info;
@@ -25,13 +25,10 @@
#include
#ifdef __ANDROID__
enh-google wrote:
looking at the bionic headers, getgrgid_r() wasn't available until API 24...
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124047
___
lldb-commits mail
https://github.com/brad0 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124182
None
>From 394b06124cc49dfca54071ef6f19ec55914c0750 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Brad Smith
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:15:50 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [lldb] Check Android API for existence of getgrgid_r()
introdu
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Brad Smith (brad0)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124182.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) lldb/source/Host/posix/HostInfoPosix.cpp (+1-1)
``diff
diff --git a/lldb/source/Host/posix/HostInf
@@ -25,13 +25,10 @@
#include
#ifdef __ANDROID__
enh-google wrote:
yeah, "if it confused you, it'll probably confuse the next person". either the
comment or the more specific `#if` sgtm...
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124047
___
https://github.com/enh-google approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124176
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -25,13 +25,10 @@
#include
#ifdef __ANDROID__
brad0 wrote:
> looking at the bionic headers, getgrgid_r() wasn't available until API 24...
Ok, thanks.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124047
___
lldb-co
@@ -25,13 +25,10 @@
#include
#ifdef __ANDROID__
enh-google wrote:
(getgrgid() has been around forever, though, so if anyone cared they could
reduce the scope of this. but probably just `#if defined(__ANDROID__) &&
(__ANDROID_API__ >= 24)` is clearer, and g
@@ -25,13 +25,10 @@
#include
#ifdef __ANDROID__
brad0 wrote:
> (getgrgid() has been around forever, though, so if anyone cared they could
> reduce the scope of this. but probably just `#if defined(__ANDROID__) &&
> (__ANDROID_API__ >= 24)` is clearer, and
https://github.com/enh-google approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124047
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -25,13 +25,10 @@
#include
#ifdef __ANDROID__
enh-google wrote:
fwiw, you shouldn't need this with any current NDK (and current NDKs support
API >= 21). looks like i added this in 2015 to support building gdb/gdbserver
out of the box and didn't realize l
https://github.com/adrian-prantl edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120163
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/adrian-prantl commented:
I found one bug, otherwise this looks good!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120163
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-comm
@@ -327,27 +358,45 @@ static lldb::offset_t GetOpcodeDataSize(const
DataExtractor &data,
return offset - data_offset;
}
+ case DW_OP_implicit_pointer: // 0xa0 4 + LEB128
+ {
+data.Skip_LEB128(&offset);
+return 4 + offset - data_offset;
adrian-
https://github.com/brad0 closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124047
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -25,13 +25,10 @@
#include
#ifdef __ANDROID__
enh-google wrote:
looking around, i see a few others that aren't true either:
```
#ifdef __ANDROID__
// Android does not have SUN_LEN
#ifndef SUN_LEN
#define SUN_LEN(ptr)
https://github.com/ZequanWu updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124048
>From 1948805894e006d84fbb78299574b3c7618959d8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zequan Wu
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 18:32:11 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [lldb][Formatters] Do not recursively dereference pointer
type
@@ -222,14 +223,15 @@ void FormatManager::GetPossibleMatches(
if (compiler_type.IsPointerType()) {
CompilerType non_ptr_type = compiler_type.GetPointeeType();
-GetPossibleMatches(valobj, non_ptr_type, use_dynamic, entries,
- current_flags.WithSt
JDevlieghere wrote:
I'm in an awkward position where I'm not able to share the riscv32 core files
I've been testing this against. @ita-sc & @AlexeyMerzlyakov, I know you two
have worked on riscv64, is there any chance you could help me generate a
riscv32 core file I can use to write a test for
https://github.com/JDevlieghere updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120163
>From 21c9bbb7edab88caeb1b121dfe9090a6a3ef4404 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jonas Devlieghere
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 17:36:24 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [lldb] Add missing operations to GetOpcodeDataSize
https://github.com/kastiglione updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123981
>From 3929895879a226bf8f0e407fead4524597a429af Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dave Lee
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 08:18:36 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [lldb] Add SBThread.selected_frame property
---
lldb/bindin
jimingham wrote:
How does this patch fit with the:
-p ( --skip-pointers )
Don't use this format for pointers-to-type objects.
-r ( --skip-references )
Don't use this format for references-to-type objects.
settings in `type add`? It seems like we let the
@@ -370,6 +370,31 @@ bool SymbolContext::GetAddressRange(uint32_t scope,
uint32_t range_idx,
return false;
}
+Address SymbolContext::GetAddress(uint32_t scope,
+ bool use_inline_block_range) const {
+ if ((scope & eSymbolContextLineEntry) &
@@ -51,6 +51,12 @@ STRING_EXTENSION_OUTSIDE(SBThread)
for idx in range(self.GetStopReasonDataCount())
]
+def set_selected_frame(self, frame):
+if isinstance(frame, SBFrame):
+self.SetSelectedFrame(frame.idx)
-
@@ -51,6 +51,12 @@ STRING_EXTENSION_OUTSIDE(SBThread)
for idx in range(self.GetStopReasonDataCount())
]
+def set_selected_frame(self, frame):
+if isinstance(frame, SBFrame):
+self.SetSelectedFrame(frame.idx)
-
https://github.com/kastiglione edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123981
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
enh-google wrote:
> I guess this means the whole "single step workaround"
> (lldb/source/Plugins/Process/Linux/SingleStepCheck.h) could go away as well
> (maybe make a separate patch for that).
from that file:
```
// The underlying issue has been fixed in android N and linux 4.4. This code can
jimingham wrote:
I still think callers shouldn't have to do this, but to make the internal API
good you'd really have to return a Status, so this is okay for now.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123981
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-comm
https://github.com/JDevlieghere updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121860
>From b0cf540a08958ead1c7b9e38f30a2722fe780592 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jonas Devlieghere
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 17:10:36 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [lldb] Implement a statusline in LLDB
MIME-Version:
@@ -25,13 +25,10 @@
#include
#ifdef __ANDROID__
brad0 wrote:
Ok, I will circle back with another set of diffs to clean up some of these
other things too. Thanks.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124047
_
Author: Brad Smith
Date: 2025-01-23T12:54:35-05:00
New Revision: ff17a4136dedba004d901a571c4fae501affd051
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ff17a4136dedba004d901a571c4fae501affd051
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ff17a4136dedba004d901a571c4fae501affd051.diff
LO
https://github.com/kazutakahirata closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124077
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
Author: Kazu Hirata
Date: 2025-01-23T08:45:59-08:00
New Revision: d05008363d4ed87b1350701831032ea5070d5b98
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d05008363d4ed87b1350701831032ea5070d5b98
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d05008363d4ed87b1350701831032ea5070d5b98.diff
L
@@ -51,6 +51,12 @@ STRING_EXTENSION_OUTSIDE(SBThread)
for idx in range(self.GetStopReasonDataCount())
]
+def set_selected_frame(self, frame):
+if isinstance(frame, SBFrame):
+self.SetSelectedFrame(frame.idx)
-
@@ -51,6 +51,12 @@ STRING_EXTENSION_OUTSIDE(SBThread)
for idx in range(self.GetStopReasonDataCount())
]
+def set_selected_frame(self, frame):
+if isinstance(frame, SBFrame):
+self.SetSelectedFrame(frame.idx)
-
@@ -51,6 +51,12 @@ STRING_EXTENSION_OUTSIDE(SBThread)
for idx in range(self.GetStopReasonDataCount())
]
+def set_selected_frame(self, frame):
+if isinstance(frame, SBFrame):
+self.SetSelectedFrame(frame.idx)
-
https://github.com/labath updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117725
>From db818448c238fe85f9bd3f322b620a4f4e171967 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pavel Labath
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 16:12:40 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [lldb] Handle improperly nested blocks differently
In 6c7f56192fa
labath wrote:
ping :)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117725
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/labath approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124176
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
Author: Brad Smith
Date: 2025-01-24T02:54:54-05:00
New Revision: e289cb545adabd8f7b72c0c4a023dcf640823767
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e289cb545adabd8f7b72c0c4a023dcf640823767
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e289cb545adabd8f7b72c0c4a023dcf640823767.diff
LO
https://github.com/brad0 closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124176
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
+//===-- DILLexer.h --*- C++
-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
https://github.com/enh-google approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124187
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
jimingham wrote:
I still feel like we should offer options here. If I as a formatter writer are
interested in handling all the pointer types of the type I've registered my
formatter for, I should be allowed to do that. If I say, my formatter is valid
for all the pointer types as well as the
https://github.com/Anthony-Eid created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124232
Closes #119784
This is still a work in progress, but I've technically fixed the bug where
lldb-dap would reuse variable IDs within the same stopped state. However, I
found another bug that is still prohib
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Brad Smith (brad0)
Changes
dladdr() was introduced 15 years ago.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124187.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) lldb/source/Host/common/Host.cpp (-2)
``diff
diff --git a/lld
jimingham wrote:
It still sounds like this is a change to accommodate formatters that aren't
correctly written. Regex formatters are slower than name match ones and more
fallible to write, so I'm not sure "you can write a regex instead" is a good
substitute.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-proj
jimingham wrote:
It isn't that hard to have your formatter dereference the ValueObject it was
provided till it's of the form that it wants to deal with (type or pointer) and
then pass that to the main formatter.
If the objection is that's a pain to do for every formatter, we could have the
ty
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
