llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `lldb-arm-ubuntu` running
on `linaro-lldb-arm-ubuntu` while building `lldb` at step 6 "test".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/18/builds/10218
Here is the relevant piece of the build log
Author: Kazu Hirata
Date: 2025-01-21T23:48:52-08:00
New Revision: d839c06719128700bdd033361b20aa6899f6620a
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d839c06719128700bdd033361b20aa6899f6620a
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d839c06719128700bdd033361b20aa6899f6620a.diff
L
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `lldb-remote-linux-win`
running on `as-builder-10` while building `lldb` at step 17
"test-check-lldb-api".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/197/builds/979
Here is the relevant piece of
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `lldb-remote-linux-ubuntu`
running on `as-builder-9` while building `lldb` at step 16
"test-check-lldb-api".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/195/builds/3828
Here is the relevant piece
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Pavel Labath (labath)
Changes
Using a "random" name for an "anonymous" pipe seems to be the state of the art
on windows (according to stack overflow, new windows versions may have
something better, but it involves calling kernel APIs direc
https://github.com/labath created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123905
Using a "random" name for an "anonymous" pipe seems to be the state of the art
on windows (according to stack overflow, new windows versions may have
something better, but it involves calling kernel APIs directl
https://github.com/labath created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123906
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#112079 due to failures on the arm bot.
>From bd56b86b4abf44432842427272bd1ff71f169e98 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pavel Labath
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 09:42:13 +0100
Subject: [PATCH]
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Pavel Labath (labath)
Changes
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#112079 due to failures on the arm bot.
---
Patch is 84.05 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123906.diff
40 Files Affected:
labath wrote:
And pushing the revert button now. :(
The remote failure I think we should just slap `@skipIfRemote` on the tests. I
don't think it makes sense to run these test remotely given that all of the
interesting stuff happens locally anyway. I would have done that as a followup
but the
chandlerc wrote:
Ping
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123308
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
Author: Pavel Labath
Date: 2025-01-22T09:43:11+01:00
New Revision: 22561cfb443267905d4190f0e2a738e6b412457f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/22561cfb443267905d4190f0e2a738e6b412457f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/22561cfb443267905d4190f0e2a738e6b412457f.diff
https://github.com/labath closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123906
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
slydiman wrote:
@labath
> The problem with the current method was that is does not produce unique names
> if one has two copies of the pipe code in the same process
Do you mean PipeWindows::CreateNew(child_process_inherit) called from different
threads may produce the same `pipe_name`?
Can yo
101 - 113 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
