Re: [Lldb-commits] [lldb] r282683 - Add a unit test for an x86_64 assembly inspection of

Hi, Is the work that you are currently doing the reason why the lldb build on i386 is failing? http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-x86_64-ubuntu-14.04-cmake http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-x86_64-ubuntu-14.04-cmake/builds/20099 Dimitar On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 5:30 AM, Jason Molenda vi

Re: [Lldb-commits] [lldb] r282683 - Add a unit test for an x86_64 assembly inspection of

This is the first build that failed right after your CL: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-x86_64-ubuntu-14.04-cmake/builds/20083 On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Dimitar Vlahovski wrote: > Hi, > > Is the work that you are currently doing the reason why the lldb build on > i386 is failing?

Re: [Lldb-commits] [lldb] r282683 - Add a unit test for an x86_64 assembly inspection of

Note that the test fails when using gcc as a compiler (specifically gcc-4.9 in this case, but hopefully the exact version does not matter here). Jason, will you be able to check this out today? On 29 September 2016 at 05:45, Dimitar Vlahovski via lldb-commits < lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:

Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D25057: Fix ARM/AArch64 Step-Over watchpoint issue remove provision for duplicate watchpoints

[phabricator seems to be down, so I'll reply here] Thank you for looking into this. Hmm... I think we can consider this an improvement over the status quo, but it's not going to solve the problem in all cases. E.g., on aarch64, a single stp instruction with neon registers can access a block of me

Re: [Lldb-commits] [lldb] r282648 - Fix an issue where libc++ changed the type information we get for std::map::iterator, rendering LLDB unable to display elements vended by an iterator

> On Sep 28, 2016, at 5:58 PM, Zachary Turner wrote: > > > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 4:02 PM Enrico Granata via lldb-commits > mailto:lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > > - > + > + static ConstString g___i_("__i_"); > + >// this must be a ValueObject* because it is a child of the Va

Re: [Lldb-commits] [lldb] r282648 - Fix an issue where libc++ changed the type information we get for std::map::iterator, rendering LLDB unable to display elements vended by an iterator

On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 10:43 AM Enrico Granata wrote: > On Sep 28, 2016, at 5:58 PM, Zachary Turner wrote: > > > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 4:02 PM Enrico Granata via lldb-commits < > lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > - > + > + static ConstString g___i_("__i_"); > + >// this must be

Re: [Lldb-commits] [lldb] r282648 - Fix an issue where libc++ changed the type information we get for std::map::iterator, rendering LLDB unable to display elements vended by an iterator

> On Sep 29, 2016, at 10:50 AM, Zachary Turner wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 10:43 AM Enrico Granata > wrote: >> On Sep 28, 2016, at 5:58 PM, Zachary Turner > > wrote: >> >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 4:02 PM Enrico Granata

Re: [Lldb-commits] [lldb] r282648 - Fix an issue where libc++ changed the type information we get for std::map::iterator, rendering LLDB unable to display elements vended by an iterator

> On Sep 29, 2016, at 10:58 AM, Enrico Granata via lldb-commits > wrote: > > >> On Sep 29, 2016, at 10:50 AM, Zachary Turner > > wrote: >> >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 10:43 AM Enrico Granata > > wrote: >>> On Sep 28, 2016, at 5:58 P

Re: [Lldb-commits] [lldb] r282648 - Fix an issue where libc++ changed the type information we get for std::map::iterator, rendering LLDB unable to display elements vended by an iterator

Yea :( In practice you're right that it might not ever be an issue, but I know one time I spent quite a long time trying to figure out why I couldn't create a variable named "unix", so any time I see questionable names it brings back terrible memories. On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 10:58 AM Enrico Gran

[Lldb-commits] [lldb] r282741 - To fix TestObjCMethods2/i386, allowed messaging nil ObjC objects as in x86_64.

Author: spyffe Date: Thu Sep 29 12:57:33 2016 New Revision: 282741 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=282741&view=rev Log: To fix TestObjCMethods2/i386, allowed messaging nil ObjC objects as in x86_64. Modified: lldb/trunk/source/Plugins/LanguageRuntime/ObjC/AppleObjCRuntime/AppleO

Re: [Lldb-commits] [lldb] r282683 - Add a unit test for an x86_64 assembly inspection of

Yep, will do. I saw that build bot result last night and ran the testsuite on my local ubuntu box and didn't repo the failure so I thought maybe it was an already-failing test case that the bot was just telling me about. But I think I was running the test x86_64 - I'll figure out how to run it

[Lldb-commits] [lldb] r282754 - Fix an issue where, in i386 mode, the wrong values were being copied into the pair object for a single-entry NSDictionary

Author: enrico Date: Thu Sep 29 14:46:48 2016 New Revision: 282754 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=282754&view=rev Log: Fix an issue where, in i386 mode, the wrong values were being copied into the pair object for a single-entry NSDictionary Fixes rdar://28502335 Modified: lld

Re: [Lldb-commits] [lldb] r282683 - Add a unit test for an x86_64 assembly inspection of

Interesting, I can't get the failure to repo with i386 + gcc-4.8 on an ubuntu 14.04.5 system. Downloading & building gcc-4.9.4 right now. $ ./dotest.py -C gcc-4.8 -A i386 --executable ~/build/bin/lldb testcases/python_api/sbdata LLDB library dir: /home/jmolenda/build/bin LLDB import library d

[Lldb-commits] [lldb] r282774 - This test will not work in i386 mode because we don't create interesting types from the ObjC runtime

Author: enrico Date: Thu Sep 29 16:20:56 2016 New Revision: 282774 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=282774&view=rev Log: This test will not work in i386 mode because we don't create interesting types from the ObjC runtime "Fixes" rdar://28501616 Modified: lldb/trunk/packages/P

[Lldb-commits] [lldb] r282787 - Fixed TestObjCMethods2/i386 by separating out the portions that require ObjC V2.

Author: spyffe Date: Thu Sep 29 16:43:31 2016 New Revision: 282787 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=282787&view=rev Log: Fixed TestObjCMethods2/i386 by separating out the portions that require ObjC V2. Modified: lldb/trunk/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/lang/objc/foundation/TestO

[Lldb-commits] [lldb] r282790 - Add a quick note about how to build lldb with debug info using

Author: jmolenda Date: Thu Sep 29 16:47:15 2016 New Revision: 282790 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=282790&view=rev Log: Add a quick note about how to build lldb with debug info using cmake/ninja on linux/bsd systems. Modified: lldb/trunk/www/build.html Modified: lldb/trunk/www

[Lldb-commits] [lldb] r282794 - Don't expect new-style Objective-C literals to work on i386 with the V1 runtime.

Author: spyffe Date: Thu Sep 29 17:01:11 2016 New Revision: 282794 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=282794&view=rev Log: Don't expect new-style Objective-C literals to work on i386 with the V1 runtime. Modified: lldb/trunk/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/lang/objc/objc-new-syntax/

[Lldb-commits] [lldb] r282803 - [CMake] LLDB/Expression needs to depend on intrinsics_gen

Author: cbieneman Date: Thu Sep 29 17:55:09 2016 New Revision: 282803 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=282803&view=rev Log: [CMake] LLDB/Expression needs to depend on intrinsics_gen IRExecutionUnit.h includes Module.h, which through a long chain of includes eventually includes Attrib

[Lldb-commits] [lldb] r282810 - Add some logging when trace is on. We're getting a bot failure on i386 that doesn't

Author: jingham Date: Thu Sep 29 18:48:21 2016 New Revision: 282810 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=282810&view=rev Log: Add some logging when trace is on. We're getting a bot failure on i386 that doesn't I can't reproduce locally. Hopefully this will help us catch the reason. Mo

[Lldb-commits] [lldb] r282811 - Switch to using TEST_EQ, TEST_FALSE where appropriate.

Author: jmolenda Date: Thu Sep 29 18:57:33 2016 New Revision: 282811 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=282811&view=rev Log: Switch to using TEST_EQ, TEST_FALSE where appropriate. Modified: lldb/trunk/unittests/UnwindAssembly/x86/Testx86AssemblyInspectionEngine.cpp Modified: lldb/

[Lldb-commits] [lldb] r282822 - Move UTF functions into namespace llvm.

Author: jlebar Date: Thu Sep 29 19:38:45 2016 New Revision: 282822 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=282822&view=rev Log: Move UTF functions into namespace llvm. Summary: This lets people link against LLVM and their own version of the UTF library. I determined this only affects llvm,

[Lldb-commits] [lldb] r282823 - Do not assume we will be able to discover the return type of this selector call, for that is not true in i386 mode

Author: enrico Date: Thu Sep 29 19:40:04 2016 New Revision: 282823 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=282823&view=rev Log: Do not assume we will be able to discover the return type of this selector call, for that is not true in i386 mode Modified: lldb/trunk/packages/Python/lldbs

[Lldb-commits] [lldb] r282825 - Add unit tests for simple frameless i386 and x86_64 function

Author: jmolenda Date: Thu Sep 29 19:41:15 2016 New Revision: 282825 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=282825&view=rev Log: Add unit tests for simple frameless i386 and x86_64 function instruction inspection to UnwindPlans. Modified: lldb/trunk/unittests/UnwindAssembly/x86/Testx86A

[Lldb-commits] [lldb] r282824 - Prefer skipping over x-failing

Author: enrico Date: Thu Sep 29 19:41:07 2016 New Revision: 282824 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=282824&view=rev Log: Prefer skipping over x-failing Modified: lldb/trunk/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functionalities/type_lookup/TestTypeLookup.py Modified: lldb/trunk/packag

[Lldb-commits] [lldb] r282830 - Add the tracking radar on our end.

Author: jingham Date: Thu Sep 29 20:23:46 2016 New Revision: 282830 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=282830&view=rev Log: Add the tracking radar on our end. Modified: lldb/trunk/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functionalities/thread/break_after_join/TestBreakAfterJoin.py Modified