Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D32522: Test case for the issue raised in D32271

2017-05-09 Thread vignesh balu via lldb-commits
you mean like this "exe = os.path.join('./newdir/','proc_attach')". I can't use "os.getcwd" as it will become the absolute path which we should not use. thanks, vbalu On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Zachary Turner wrote: > Can you rewrite the exe path computation to use os.path.join so we're n

Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D32522: Test case for the issue raised in D32271

2017-05-03 Thread Pavel Labath via lldb-commits
On 3 May 2017 at 07:41, vignesh balu wrote: > you mean like this "exe = os.path.join('./newdir/','proc_attach')". I can't probably something like: os.path.join('.', 'newdir', 'proc_attach') ___ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http:

Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D32522: Test case for the issue raised in D32271

2017-05-02 Thread Zachary Turner via lldb-commits
Can you rewrite the exe path computation to use os.path.join so we're not assuming posix syntax? On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 11:11 PM vignesh balu via Phabricator via lldb-commits wrote: > vbalu updated this revision to Diff 97550. > vbalu added a comment. > > Corrected the code. Now this test will fa