On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Jim Ingham wrote:
> We've had a couple of cases of "dead" code which turned out to be the
> llvm.org side of generic behavior for which Swift was the only current
> specific implementation. So while I agree, little single functions that
> aren't used anywhere
We've had a couple of cases of "dead" code which turned out to be the llvm.org
side of generic behavior for which Swift was the only current specific
implementation. So while I agree, little single functions that aren't used
anywhere are fine to cull, anything that looks like it might be the fo
