Jlalond wrote:
> I think the tricky part is that (in both cases) the user might legitimately
> want to let the process exit, and "continue" is the normal way to do that, so
> I don't think we'd want to just error out of the continue command (or from
> the vCont packet). I think what we'd want
labath wrote:
We already have one piece of "status" parsing code in
`source/Host/linux/Host.cpp`. I think it'd be better to reuse that one. I'm
slightly torn as to whether reuse Host::GetProcessInfo for this (and add a new
field to ProcessInstanceInfo -- or possibly expand on IsZombie), or whe
https://github.com/Jlalond updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137041
>From a33b865302e0d489cc4426c038128d8dde47500e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jacob Lalonde
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 16:35:00 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Create proc status reader
---
.../Plugins/Process/Utility/
https://github.com/Jlalond created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137041
This the actual PR to my [SEIZE
RFC](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-ptrace-seize-when-attaching-to-dead-processes/85825/8).
This is currently the bare bones on seizing a dead process, and being able to
attac
